Am Samstag, den 17.07.2010, 12:31 +0200 schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger: > > My idea was that everything that is not "broken" in hardware doesn't > > need a delay, so 0 is a sane default and programmers can set this to a > > bigger value in their code if they think that this programmer is so > > slow, but I don't really care, 1 as default is OK too. > I based the delay requirement on the possibility of really fast > hardware. Once your hardware can do bitbanging at speeds above 16 MHz, > it is too fast for some SPI chips. I don't see any uncached Bus in PC environment reaching 16MHz anytime soon (i.e. 32 megacycles per second). That's why I expected the code to be always slow enough.
> Please undo that hunk. It breaks a few semi-supported SPI chips with odd > sector sizes and is inconsistent with how the other SPI drivers do it. OK, undone, and committed as r1084. Regards, Michael Karcher _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list flashrom@flashrom.org http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
