Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > > flashrom takes slighly more time due to various calibration > > routines (I could not find a way to disable those, but I didn't > > try very hard), > > If you already have a known-good delay function with microsecond > precision, you could use that instead of waiting for flashrom to > calibrate its own delay loop.
I'd suggest a setting which makes flashrom skip all parallel flash chips, to remove any need for calibration. (To be more precise, the deciding factor is whether the chip is on the local bus, or if there are some bus master(s) in between, but that's generally equivalent to parallel vs. all others.) //Peter _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list flashrom@flashrom.org http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
