On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Stefan Tauner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:20:30 +0800 > "Bao, Zheng" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Since the Dediprog can work now, if I just want to use flashrom as a >> programmer interface, I may erase the host BIOS accidently. I think if >> the flashrom is built without the self-programming feature by some >> easy settings, I don't have to worry about it. >> > > maybe i am missing something, but would setting CONFIG_INTERNAL to "no" > in the makefile achieve what you are looking for? > > if we continue to support more and more non-internal devices it might > even be a good idea to change the default behavior: > if the internal interface is not explicitly named as parameter on the > cli, warn and ask the user if he really wants to flash the current > motherboard. what do others think about this? >
Maybe just use an alias or script for non-internal devices. It would always set the remote device flag correctly. This could be easily added in the flashrom make install or to a flashrom package. Call it remote-flashrom, dedi-flashrom, or some such name. Marc -- http://se-eng.com _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
