On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:45:31 +0200 Stefan Tauner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:00:41 +0200 > Idwer Vollering <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2011/3/15 Stefan Tauner <[email protected]>: > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <[email protected]> > > > > Acked-by: Idwer Vollering <[email protected]> > > > > But *only* if the probe/read/erase/write status is not affected. > > the only difference between the non-n version and the n version is, > that the reset pin of the n version is not connected. > do we even use the hardware reset? if not this should not change > anything. > > ps: the difference between B and T is the (non-uniform) sector > structure > pps: i have a MX29F002NTPC-12, but i dont have any indication that i > have tested it for full PREW. there was a successful test for > MX29F001TPC-12 though on the ml (and i have submitted an already acked > patch for it). want me to test it "again"? > i have finally added this to my tested stuff branch and will commit it later. thanks for the review idwer! -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
