Am 23.08.2011 17:12 schrieb Stefan Tauner: > compile tested with gcc 4.4.5 and clang 2.8
I agree with the idea and support it. However, I don't know how supportable this is on 16 bit platforms with 16 bit int. We need at least 24 bits to handle flash addresses, and we could either create a new typedef chipoffset_t or specify uint32_t explicitly. I favor a new typedef because it will make auditing easier if we ever run on 16 bit programmers. > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <[email protected]> A comment about the typedef idea would be appreciated. Anyway, this is (even if you reject the explicit type idea) Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
