On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:34:13 +0100 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 22.02.2012 00:14 schrieb Stefan Tauner: > > sfdp_add_uniform_eraser checks for existing erasers. Due to a bug it > > looked for eraser slots that have no erase functions set instead of > > those that have one set. > > > > Postpone adding an erase function for the special 4k block erase > > opcode until we know the flash chip size and add an additional check > > to sfdp_add_uniform_eraser. > > > > Fix the output of the parameter table contents. > > > > This patch fixes the index used to retrieve the eraser types, which > > was off one double word. > > > > Refine some messages and add a few further debugging prints. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <[email protected]> > > I assume this has been tested with the dummy simulator. now it has been ;) the only additional change i have made: i have indented the "It seems like this chip supports the preliminary Intel version"… > Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> thanks, committed in r1505. let's hope we have tackled everything. :) -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
