The submission of zero-sized read requests in a write-only transaction
fails at least for omap2_mcspi drivers and is pointless in general.

Even with this patch, zero-sized write requests might be submitted for
read-only transactions, but for most SPI chips, there always is a command
transferred (written) before reading data, so there is no such thing as
a pure-read transaction.

Signed-off-by: Michael Karcher <[email protected]>
---
 linux_spi.c |   10 +++++++++-
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/linux_spi.c b/linux_spi.c
index d994389..3d1ca3e 100644
--- a/linux_spi.c
+++ b/linux_spi.c
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ static int linux_spi_send_command(struct flashctx *flash, 
unsigned int writecnt,
                                  const unsigned char *txbuf,
                                  unsigned char *rxbuf)
 {
+       unsigned iocontrol_code;
        struct spi_ioc_transfer msg[2] = {
                {
                        .tx_buf = (uint64_t)(ptrdiff_t)txbuf,
@@ -128,7 +129,14 @@ static int linux_spi_send_command(struct flashctx *flash, 
unsigned int writecnt,
        if (fd == -1)
                return -1;
 
-       if (ioctl(fd, SPI_IOC_MESSAGE(2), msg) == -1) {
+       /* Just submit the first (write) request in case there is nothing
+          to read. Otherwise submit both requests */
+       if (readcnt == 0)
+               iocontrol_code = SPI_IOC_MESSAGE(1);
+       else
+               iocontrol_code = SPI_IOC_MESSAGE(2);
+
+       if (ioctl(fd, iocontrol_code, msg) == -1) {
                msg_cerr("%s: ioctl: %s\n", __func__, strerror(errno));
                return -1;
        }
-- 
1.7.9


_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom

Reply via email to