On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 04:00:27 +0100 Stefan Tauner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:53:43 +0100 > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Is there a reason you introduce a .devices struct member inside struct > > programmer_entry in patch 1 just to rename it to .dev in patch 3? > > not really (of course). probably some column limit made me do it :P > which one do you prefer - devices or devs? i'll change the first patch > accordingly if needed. if you (or anybody else for that matter) do not > respond till i am ready with the patch set, then i will use 'devs'. and more importantly: is that the only thing you want to discus about this patch? :) -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
