On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:32:00 +0200 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 10.07.2013 21:17 schrieb Stefan Tauner: > > Tested mainboards: > > OK: > > - ASUS C60M1-I > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-February/010578.html > > - ASUS P8H77-I > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-March/010607.html > > - ASUS P8H77-M > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-May/010994.html > > - ASUS P8P67 LE (B2) > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-May/010972.html > > - Elitegroup GeForce6100PM-M2 (V3.0) > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-July/011177.html > > - MSI B75MA-E33 (MS-7808) > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-March/010659.html > > - MSI H77MA-G43 (MS-7756) > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-April/010853.html > > - MSI KA780G (MS-7551) > > http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=1617 > > NOT OK: > > - ASRock Fatal1ty Z77 Performance > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-January/010467.html > > - ASRock Z68 Extreme4 > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-May/010984.html > > - ASUS P8B75-M LE > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-April/010867.html > > - ASUS P8P67-M PRO > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-February/010541.html > > - ASUS P8Z68-V LE > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-February/010582.html > > - Intel DQ77MK > > http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=1603 > > - Supermicro X9DRD-7LN4F > > http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=1582 > > - Supermicro X9SCE-F > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-February/010588.html > > - Supermicro X9SCM-F > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-February/010527.html > > - Tyan S7066 > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-March/010630.html > > > > Chipsets: > > - Marked Intel B75 as tested > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-March/010659.html > > - Marked Intel H77 as tested > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-March/010607.html > > - Removed 10de:03e2 because it is apparently the MCP61 host bridge. > > It was reclassified to Host Bridge in the PCI device ID database and > > there > > is at least one report suggesting this configuration too: > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2012-August/009716.html > > - Added MCP89 which hopefully works with the code for previous versions. > > Thanks to James Laird for submitting this change. > > > > Tested flash chips: > > - Atmel AT25DF641(A) to PREW (+PREW) > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-June/011113.html > > - Atmel AT25F512 to PREW (+PREW) > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-April/010904.html > > Also, change its ID according to Modification of PCN SC040401A: > > "There has been a change in the returned value of the Product > > Identification > > (RDID) command, the AT25F512A RDID code is 65h compared to 60h from > > the AT25F512 product." > > It seems to be quite likely that all AT25F512 are fully functional > > relabeled > > AT25F1024 chips. There are even some hints in the datasheet: > > in table 6 they stress that address pin 16 needs to be low under all > > circum- > > stances; while continuous reads can wrap around on the AT25F1024 the DS > > notes "For the AT25F512, the read command must be terminated when the > > highest address (00FFFF) is reached." OTOH the lock bit semantics are > > different, but this has not been tested thoroughly > > - Atmel AT25F512A to PREW (+PREW) > > http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=1569 > > - Eon EN25F05 to PREW (+PREW) > > http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=1571 > > - Macronix MX25L12805(D) to PREW (+REW) > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-April/010913.html > > - Spansion S25FL256S......0 and S25FL512S to P/!R!E!W (+P) > > Tested by Stefan Tauner > > - Micron/Numonyx/ST M25PX80 to PREW (+PREW) > > Tested by Stefan Tauner > > - Micron/Numonyx/ST N25Q032..3E and N25Q128..3E to PREW (+PREW) > > Tested by Stefan Tauner > > - Micron/Numonyx/ST N25Q256..3E and N25Q512..3G to P/!R!E!W (+P) > > Tested by Stefan Tauner > > - SST SST25VF040B to PREW (+PREW) > > http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=1574 > > - SST SST25VF040B.REMS to PREW (+EW) > > http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=1575 > > - ST M25P05-A to PREW (+PREW) > > http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=1576 > > - ST M29W512B to PREW (+W) > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-March/010635.html > > - Winbond W25Q64.W to PREW (+PREW) > > Tested by the chromiumos guys. > > - Winbond W25Q128.V to PREW (+REW) > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-June/011108.html > > - Winbond W25X20 to PREW (+PREW) > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-May/010990.html > > > > Miscellaneous: > > - Add Lenovo X201 to the laptop whitelist. > > - Add chip IDs for the ESMT F25L..QA family. > > - Add chip IDs for a few Macronix MX25 models. > > - The list of flashchips is not sorted strictly alphabetically and should > > not be > > either. Refine the comment explaining the scheme on top of the list. > > - Support -L output of chip sizes with up to 6 decimal places (up to 4 Gb). > > - Add explanations at the top of the flash chip table in the wiki. > > - Escape mainboard notes in the wiki output with <nowiki> (this became > > necessary because MediaWiki started to convert <[email protected]> to > > <mark>). > > - Tiny other stuff. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Stefan Tauner <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> I have changed a few additional things and committed in r1702, thanks. -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
