On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:12:56 +0200
Stefan Tauner <[email protected]> wrote:

> We forgot to shift the addresses for continuation bytes in r1840.
> Also, probe_en29lv640b() can easily be replaced with refined probe_jedec().
> Furthermore, add EN29LV640T which is the top boot sector-variant of
> EN29LV640B.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
> Rudolf, if you still have access to the bifferboard, I'd very welcome
> testing this patch on it. This would verify the change we did in r1840
> (+ its fix in this patch) + the refactoring as well.
> 
> I might look into the write function later too, but currently probing
> functions are my main focus.

Actually I don't see anything unusual in the datasheet regarding
writing either, where does it state that the chip has to be programmed
in 16b words even if BYTE# is low?. I am not 100% if jedec_probe needs a
refinement for shifted access too, but we should be able to get this
to work in any case without an extra function, Carl-Daniel, please
advice. :)

PS: I have removed probe_en29lv640b() locally which I forgot on the
posted patch.
-- 
Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom

Reply via email to