Здравствуйте, Stefan. Вы писали 6 января 2015 г., 4:32:44:
Hi, Stefan!! Sorry, i tested write twice and i tested also full erased chip cFeon EN25P64 all ok with it with "EN25B64" variant. about size ot sector i may say nothing. If you want - send me flashrom debug variant and i run it and i send report to you. What you say? P.S. If you want - i may use rayer_spi or arm-usb-tiny-h devices. ---------- Sorry, Stefan, i can inadequate question to you? I need read unique ID info and OTP zones from W25Q64BV, W25Q64CV and W25Q64FV chips. also, MX25L6405 Please, maybe is it patch or OTP_version of flashrom to read it datas? > On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 07:36:42 +0500 > [email protected] wrote: >> Здравствуйте, Flashrom. >> >> I try read chip cFeon EN25P64 - 16 pins, through adapter SPI 16 to 8 >> but flashrom show two INVALID variants: >> >> #flashrom -p ft2232_spi:type=arm-usb-tiny-h >> >> flashrom v0.9.7-r1852 on Linux 3.2.66 (i686) >> flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.org >> >> Calibrating delay loop... OK. >> Found Eon flash chip "EN25B64" (8192 kB, SPI) on ft2232_spi. >> Found Eon flash chip "EN25B64T" (8192 kB, SPI) on ft2232_spi. >> Multiple flash chip definitions match the detected chip(s): "EN25B64", >> "EN25B64T" >> Please specify which chip definition to use with the -c <chipname> option. >> >> >> >> >> read normally: >> >> >> date >> flashrom -p ft2232_spi:type=arm-usb-tiny-h -c EN25B64 -r 234 >> date >> >> 1 min 5 sec >> >> >> >> >> write okey: >> >> flashrom -p ft2232_spi:type=arm-usb-tiny-h -c EN25B64 -w 3883 >> flashrom v0.9.7-r1852 on Linux 3.2.66 (i686) >> flashrom is free software, get the source code at http://www.flashrom.org >> >> Calibrating delay loop... OK. >> Found Eon flash chip "EN25B64" (8192 kB, SPI) on ft2232_spi. >> === >> This flash part has status UNTESTED for operations: PROBE READ ERASE WRITE >> The test status of this chip may have been updated in the latest development >> version of flashrom. If you are running the latest development version, >> please email a report to [email protected] if any of the above operations >> work correctly for you with this flash chip. Please include the flashrom log >> file for all operations you tested (see the man page for details), and >> mention >> which mainboard or programmer you tested in the subject line. >> Thanks for your help! >> Reading old flash chip contents... done. >> Erasing and writing flash chip... Erase/write done. >> Verifying flash... VERIFIED. > Здравствуйте! :) > Thank you for your report. > The reason why you see the "EN25B64" and "EN25B64T" variants be detect > is that they have the same RDID as the EN25P64, which is not uncommon. > However if I interpret your email correctly, then you have written your > EN25P64 successfully and without warnings or error messages by using > the flash chip definition of EN25B64. This is confusing for me because > it should actually not work. The EN25P64 and EN25B64 have very > different block layouts. The P variant has a unified sector size of > 64kB while the B variants have "Two 4-Kbyte, one 8-Kbyte, one 16-Kbyte, > one 32-Kbyte, and one hundred twenty-seven 64-Kbyte sectors". > Did I miss something? -- С уважением, Novoagansk mailto:[email protected] _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
