Hi, On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Stefan Tauner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 1 Mar 2015 10:58:46 +0100 > The Raven <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Am 01.03.2015 um 01:39 schrieb Stefan Tauner: >> > On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:11:01 +0100 >> > The Raven <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Error: invalid response 0x03 from device >> > As always ;) this is a serprog problem... >> > >> Are you really sure? I ask me why i get this error only on this chip? >> I have tested a lot of MX-Chips and all worked fine. Only this chip does >> not work, and >> all of those chips stuck always at the same byte-count. >> So i am not sure if this is a serprog problem. ;-) > > No, I am not 100% sure. But I don't trust that programmer at all. > The indication I posted is written very late, way after the first > error, but whenever I see it, I perceive the log as completely bogus.
Yeah I'm thinking propably a problem of the serprog device - "serprog-duino". What is the exact hardware? (and link to firmware you used). Also, just for all serprog users, I'd like to hear reports (works/fails/faster/slower/???) from using this branch: https://github.com/urjaman/flashrom/tree/serprog-improvements It might be better or it might show the failures of your serprog device faster. I think the diagnostics are also slightly better for some cases. -- Urja Rannikko _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
