Apart from the JEDEC ID (621614) the difference from the SST25WF080 is that
it lacks op codes 0xAD (AAI Word program) and 0x52 (32K erase).

Tested under Linux with spidev.

Signed-off-by: Ben Gardner <[email protected]>
---
 flashchips.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 flashchips.h |  3 ++-
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/flashchips.c b/flashchips.c
index 8b5d1ec..b71bd2c 100644
--- a/flashchips.c
+++ b/flashchips.c
@@ -11803,6 +11803,41 @@ const struct flashchip flashchips[] = {

        {
                .vendor         = "SST",
+               .name           = "SST25WF080B",
+               .bustype        = BUS_SPI,
+               .manufacture_id = SST_ID_62,
+               .model_id       = SST_SST25WF080B,
+               .total_size     = 1024,
+               .page_size      = 256,
+               .feature_bits   = FEATURE_WRSR_EITHER,
+               .tested         = TEST_OK_PREW,
+               .probe          = probe_spi_rdid,
+               .probe_timing   = TIMING_ZERO,
+               .block_erasers  =
+               {
+                       {
+                               .eraseblocks = { {4 * 1024, 256} },
+                               .block_erase = spi_block_erase_20,
+                       }, {
+                               .eraseblocks = { {64 * 1024, 16} },
+                               .block_erase = spi_block_erase_d8,
+                       }, {
+                               .eraseblocks = { {1024 * 1024, 1} },
+                               .block_erase = spi_block_erase_60,
+                       }, {
+                               .eraseblocks = { {1024 * 1024, 1} },
+                               .block_erase = spi_block_erase_c7,
+                       },
+               },
+               .printlock      = spi_prettyprint_status_register_sst25, /* 
*does* have a BP3 but it is useless */
+               .unlock         = spi_disable_blockprotect_bp3_srwd,
+               .write          = spi_chip_write_256,
+               .read           = spi_chip_read, /* Fast read (0x0B) supported 
*/
+               .voltage        = {1650, 1950},
+       },
+
+       {
+               .vendor         = "SST",
                .name           = "SST28SF040A",
                .bustype        = BUS_PARALLEL,
                .manufacture_id = SST_ID,
diff --git a/flashchips.h b/flashchips.h
index 07ae49d..d6b2b8d 100644
--- a/flashchips.h
+++ b/flashchips.h
@@ -659,6 +659,7 @@
  * byte of device ID is related to log(bitsize) at least for some chips.
  */
 #define SST_ID                 0xBF    /* SST */
+#define SST_ID_62              0x62    /* SST */
 #define SST_SST25LF020_REMS    0x43    /* REMS or RES opcode */
 #define SST_SST25WF512         0x2501
 #define SST_SST25WF010         0x2502
@@ -669,7 +670,7 @@
  * IDs and were not spotted in the wild yet. Their datasheets show a 4 byte 
long response w/o a vendor ID. */
 #define SST_SST25WF020A                /* 0x62 0x16 0x12 0x00 */
 #define SST_SST25WF040B                /* 0x62 0x16 0x13 0x00 */
-#define SST_SST25WF080B                /* 0x62 0x16 0x14 0x00 */
+#define SST_SST25WF080B                0x1614  /* 0x62 0x16 0x14 0x00 */
 #define SST_SST25VF512_REMS    0x48    /* REMS or RES opcode, same as 
SST25VF512A */
 #define SST_SST25VF010_REMS    0x49    /* REMS or RES opcode, same as 
SST25VF010A */
 #define SST_SST25VF020_REMS    0x43    /* REMS or RES opcode, same as 
SST25LF020A */
--
1.9.1

This email and any attachments are only for use by the intended recipient(s) 
and may contain legally privileged, confidential, proprietary or otherwise 
private information. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, dissemination, 
distribution or other disclosure of the contents of this e-mail or its 
attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, 
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Neither this 
information block, the typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this 
message is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific 
statement to the contrary is included in this message.

_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom

Reply via email to