On 20/03/2017, Sam Kuper <sam.ku...@uclmail.net> wrote: > On 20/03/2017, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> > wrote: >> On 18.03.2017 17:50, Sam Kuper wrote: >>> Ideally, Flashrom would license the content under the GFDL and CC >>> BY-SA 3.0, making the content entirely license-compatible with content >>> from Wikipedia and from the Stack Exchange network of websites. >> >> Any licensing which inhibits moving code comments to the wiki or vice >> versa is a really bad idea. > > I doubt this would be a problem in practice. I think there are > standard exceptions for this sort of thing. But I'll try to remember > to look into it, because if there *aren't* exceptions for it, then > you're right: it could be a problem.
Also, even if the wiki content were licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0, I don't see how there would be any more of an impediment to moving text between the code and the wiki than presently exists. Please correct me if you think I am mistaken. _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list flashrom@flashrom.org https://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
