> On Jun 26, 2018, at 12:43 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> wrote: > > There's a limit to the maximum aggregation size on VO and VI (for VO it > is '1 packet' as Sebastian noted). Minstrel will take this into account > when building the aggregate, but IIRC only for the first entry in the > retry chain. Since the second entry in the chain tends to transmit at a > lower bitrate (and the limit is measured in time not bytes), the same > aggregate can exceed the limit, and thus be out of spec.
Aha, thanks, so there are time (not bitrate) constraints that may be violated, possibly by having more data in VO/VI than may ordinarily be expected, and it can be exacerbated if there are retries. Makes sense now, assuming I have it right... > RRUL sends TCP bulk flows by design. Rate limiting would not make sense > for that test... And, as noted above, there's not actually any (byte) > rate limits in play here... Understood. :)
_______________________________________________ Flent-users mailing list [email protected] http://flent.org/mailman/listinfo/flent-users_flent.org
