On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Justin Mclean <[email protected]>wrote:
> Forgot to say there is an one advantage in having a different name space > for new stuff in that it tell you straight away that you need to use the > Apache Flex SDK not the Adobe 4.6 SDK. My vote is to keep the spark ns in the 4.x branch and then have a new namespace when we decide to create a new set of components. I do agree with Daniel in that we don't use "apache" or any derivation as we are then stuck for the next set of components. Though I may be convinced to have a namespace for experimental components. In the past Adobe had a release schedule and all components we setup with a new release. Now we may have people pulling for a more experimental branch. It may be nice to have a different namespace for components that are more of a work-in-progress or unsure of their final inclusion. I am mentally on the fence about that. -- Jonathan Campos
