[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-29?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13233916#comment-13233916
 ] 

Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-29:
-----------------------------------

Committed to patches branch. Still an open question to what namespace these 
components should live in I've gone with http://flex.apache.org/ns for now. 
                
> Existing validator and formatter classes only validate US and Canadian 
> postcodes
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLEX-29
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-29
>             Project: Apache Flex
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Justin Mclean
>            Assignee: Justin Mclean
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Despite the Flex SDK having several supported locales it only supports US and 
> Canadian style zip codes. It should provide a more flexible way to validate 
> and format worldwide postcodes.
> I've created PostCodeValidation and PostCodeFormatter classes that solve that 
> very issue.
> The components, tests and example application can be found here:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/flex/whiteboard/jmclean/validators/src/
> Compared to the existing validators they:
> 1. Supports a wide range of postcode  formats both numeric and alpha numeric
> 2. Provide convenience functions to obtain formats for common locales
> 3. Provides a  mechanism for user defined validation
> 4. Supports fullwidth characters (as it uses flash.globization classes for 
> string comparisons)
> 5. Easier to extend (although less need to do so as they are more flexible)
> Code has been:
> 1. Reviewed by a couple of people on the list and code has been updated based 
> on those reviews.
> 2. Generates nice ASdocs.
> 3. Working examples has been provided.
> 4. Code is unit tested including fullwidth characters.
> 5. Code is better quality than existing ZipCode validator components (IMO)
> Possibly outstanding.
> There are some architectural changes that could be made but they they would 
> probably have to be made to all Validators.
> The ASDocs could do with a review but certainly reasonable.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to