On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Martin Heidegger <[email protected]>wrote:
> You are right, it was not decided (one step at a time): that's why I > marked it as "first release" and "first major release". > > yours > Martin. > > > > On 31/03/2012 21:03, Jeffry Houser wrote: > >> On 3/31/2012 1:06 AM, Martin Heidegger wrote: >> >>> >>> 1) Keep the current package names in the first Apache Flex release 4.8 >>> 2) Change the package names in the first major Apache release 5 >>> >> >> In terms of version numbers; I didn't think anything was decided. I >> understood there was a chance Adobe could continue the Adobe Flex 4.x line >> for support reasons; and we probably want to avoid any duplication of >> numbers. >> >> > We've had this discussion so many times, here's a link to one particular time: [1] That's why the current numbers are in the wiki: [2] Do we really need to have this discussion again? [1] http://markmail.org/search/?q=list%3Aorg.apache.incubator.flex-dev+%5BDISCUSS%5D+ApacheFlex+Versioning#query:list%3Aorg.apache.incubator.flex-dev%20%5BDISCUSS%5D%20ApacheFlex%20Versioning+page:1+mid:4orcez5h2xkq4zgg+state:results [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Decisions+so+far -- Omar Gonzalez [email protected]
