On Apr 21, 2012, at 9:29 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 4/21/12 4:28 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Carol Frampton <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Early next week we hope to start posting release candidates... >> >> Cool! >> >> Note that IMO we cannot accept a release under the Flex name before >> the ASF has explicit permission to use that trademark. I have updated >> FLEX-3 with the latest status. >> >> This doesn't prevent going forward with release candidates, just >> wanted to make sure people are aware of that issue. > Yes, we expect the RCs to be pulled back several times before we ask the > IPMC for approval. Not only do we have to work out the Trademark issue, we > will be asking the mentors to make sure that we are handling various > binaries correctly.
The LICENSE and LICENSE.bin files at the root of the SVN trunk need to properly broken up into LICENSE / NOTICE and LICENSE.bin / NOTICE.bin. Please see these two pages. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice LICENSE is about the Apache License 2.0 plus any additional category-A compatible licenses. NOTICE is for copyright and similar informationabout the included source code likely starting with the Adobe copyright. Regards, Dave > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >
