Chris, I think we actually are talking about two ways:
1) maintain the structure and use a tool (like you did) to transform the sdk to maven compliant sdk. 2) change sdk structure to get directly a maven compliant sdk IMHO the best way should be 2), since now is the right time to make changes. Maybe just as soon as Apache Flex 4.8 sdk will be released, right? Tools should change to make Apache Flex SDK compliant. 2012/5/24 [email protected] <[email protected]> > I wasn't talking about changing the SDK structure in the installable SDK > version which Flash Builder would use. I was more talking about deploying a > mavenized version in Maven Central. This should not have any effect on > Flash Builder. But as I understood there allready are incompatabilities, as > the playerglobals can no longer be shipped with the SDK. > > Chris > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Carol Frampton [mailto:[email protected]] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2012 16:07 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: Apache Flex structure to be BMS compliant (was Re: Library > Versions used in Flex SDK) > > Just be aware that if you are talking about moving directories around will > quite likely break Apache Flex working with Flash Builder and/or IntelliJ. > > Carol > > On 5/24/12 10 :01AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> be a good thing for the people maintaining Flex to also maintain its > >Metadata > >So putting the metadata into the Apache Flex SVN repo would be a good > >start? > > > >Chris, > > > >I understand that Marvin gave you the built instructions and xml files > >to create a mavenized Flex SDK or that you can talk with him to get it > >from first hand. Moreover, if you was working with all SDKs as you > >report, you already know all about this process. > > > >That process could give us the keys to rethink all Apache Flex SDK > >structure to be BMS (Build Management System) compliant. (Regarding the > >instructions, if you can't get it I can provide you with the files I > >used in my company and some instructions, although there's some places > >out there where you can find it.) > > > >I think that we need to create the needed pom(s) (in the maven case, I > >don't know yet how gradle works) for the new refactorized flex sdks in > >order to create the artifacts. The last point to take into account > >would be to talk with apache maven project to publish in maven central > >repository the flex sdk artifacts. (Maybe I'm wrong in some step since > >I never do something like this... thiese are theoreticaly the steps to > >follow). > > > >In this way we could have all artifacts directly available when a new > >flex sdk was released in a maven central repository. > > -- Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnología M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 35 57 77 <http://www.codeoscopic.com> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com> Avd. del General Perón, 32 Planta 10, Puertas P-Q 28020 Madrid
