On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:44 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok ... but actually using the default version seems to be the better way. If > the originals are flawed it would be good to file bug-reports with the > original project and help them fix those problems. > If they are simply inconveniancies, I would suggest to implement workarounds > ... using patched jars sort of gives me a really bad feeling. Especially if > you could end up in Classloading version problems since we don't have > separate classloaders.
I hope our long-term goal would be to fix these issues by either contributing back the changes or extending the original projects to implement our changes. But the short-term goal is to get a parity release out so I'd think we'd rather just release the patched version with a parity release. Greg
