Hi Alex, I compare [1] the remote custom_headerRenderersAS.png with the local one and see that the missing asset is a cyan ball. As you say is not there any more (maybe due to copyright?)...I think that png should be commited. What do you think?
[1] https://dl.dropbox.com/u/8496144/COMPARISION_custom_headerRenderersAS.png 2012/8/27 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: > Right Alex, > > my frist commit was only the five files modified, but I package all > the changes of the run due to the Peter's commit. Since the changes > are due to location modification in the mouse I think is valid (we are > not testing things related to the bitmap itself and we should don't > care if the bitmap is more or less accurate), so you can remove the > bitmaps and only commit the five modifications if the patch is working > for you. As you say the last one you mention is missing and I don't > understand why...how could we do there? > > Thanks > > > 2012/8/27 Alex Harui <[email protected]>: > >> Hi Carlos, >> >> The patch only changed 5 files. There were bitmap differences between what >> is checked in. It might be that assets have changed in the transition from >> FLA assets to FXG assets. The question is whether we should modify the FXG >> assets or ignore the differences and change the baselines. And, one bitmap >> (itemRenderers/Halo/DataGrid/baselines/custom_headerRenderersAS.png) seems >> to be missing its asset. Are you seeing that as well? > > -- > Carlos Rovira > Director de Tecnología > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > F: +34 912 35 57 77 > CODEOSCOPIC S.A. > Avd. del General Perón, 32 > Planta 10, Puertas P-Q > 28020 Madrid -- Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnología M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 35 57 77 CODEOSCOPIC S.A. Avd. del General Perón, 32 Planta 10, Puertas P-Q 28020 Madrid
