Yes, it is, but doesn't mean it is regression issues free =D
If flexmojos works on 2.0.9 and 2.0.10 and doesn't on 2.2.1 is necessary to
check if is a know regression or a bug, if indeed is a bug we must report.


VELO

On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:09 PM, David Rom <[email protected]> wrote:

> Is 2.2 considered production ready or is it a moving target?  Should we
> even be worrying about issues supporting it yet?
>
> I remember seeing a series of slides or something explaining the
> motivations and statuses for the different branches, but I can't seem to
> find it anymore.  It may have just popped up in an RSS feed.  I remember it
> made sense at the time, but now my memory's fuzzy and I don't see any other
> equivalent explanations on the ASF page (at least not front and center).
>
> --David
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 4:47 PM, David Rom <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> It works with the parent build, but breaks with the module build.
>>>> When I build the war module the ${build.finalName} property gets
>>>> replaced with ${project.artifactId} rather than the actual artifact
>>>> file name.  I think something must have changed with the way maven
>>>> handles properties, but I don't know enough about maven (or Flexmojos)
>>>> to offer a better explanation.  I'll add an issue to JIRA for this and
>>>> do my best to clean up the example you looked at so it illustrates the
>>>> behavior.  For myself, I will simply use maven 2.0.10.
>>>>
>>> Hmmm...  that's weird.  Velo might know better about the differences or
>>> even already have a general strategy of dealing with 2.0.9 vs 2.2.x issues.
>>> I think I remember seeing some other threads on the group where that was
>>> discovered to be the root cause of their problems, but I don't remember
>>> offhand if they were ever resolved (other then by, like you, reverting back
>>> to 2.0.9/10).
>>>
>>
>> I don't think there is much I can do.... specially if it is a maven bug =/
>>
>> I will try to look into it, eventually =D
>>
>> VELO
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en

http://blog.flex-mojos.info/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to