they'd definitely seem more portable, with stand-alone project / pom setups.
we'll be looking at this shortly, so has been in back of my mind.. On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > No, no, it is completely out of scale.... I just wanna express I really > dislike this projects with everything in the same source tree =D > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Scott Langeberg <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Wait - one hundred poms for two (hundred) modules? >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Flexmojos support both way, so your call. >>> From pass experience I prefer to write one hundred poms to have two >>> modules on the same project. But that is me. >>> >>> >>> VELO >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:42 PM, theo2xl <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I am having some trouble finding comprehensive documentation on Flex >>>> module support. I am unclear if I should be building a new Maven >>>> project for each module, or if I should be building modules into my >>>> project and then using a feature of the plugin (such as moduleFiles) >>>> to compile and use them. Just a nudge in the right direction would be >>>> greatly appreciated. >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
