Hi Jesse/VELO,
Any updates with the link report scanner?  I encountered this same
issue so I decided to write a LinkReportScanner that extends the
existing functionality of the DirectoryScanner and adds the ability to
just include the as/mxml files that are specified in the link report
(as discussed in this thread).  It's a simple solution but it works.
I will attach the changes to the issue ticket if you guys haven't
already started working on an "official" solution.

Thanks,
Daniel

On Jul 27, 4:11 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sure, I will apply it right away.... I may got to the file thing in the
> future, but for sure not gonna happen anytime soon, so it is likely your
> change will be there for ever =D
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Jesse Sightler 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > I don't really see how it would be slower than reading and parsing hundreds
> > (if not thousands) of separate files.  It also brings in the issue of
> > parsing as code to accurately determine if it  includes classes.
>
> > Honestly, I'd greatly prefer a link-report based solution to something
> > based on guessing the files used.  I don't really care about coverage for
> > files that aren't in the SWF anyway. :)  Really, I could see where some
> > people would prefer to have both options available to them.
>
> > If I send a prototype of this approach (link-report parsing), would it be
> > likely to get considered for inclusion?
>
> > Thanks,
> > Jess
>
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> link-report would be more accurate (I guess), but it would be slower
> >> (parsing xml) and still my left classes behind..... test code coverage
> >> should check coverage of all classes, not only the used by the APP.....
>
> >> This advanced scanner (as a configurable thing) I'm more willing to
> >> include on flexmojos.
>
> >> VELO
>
> >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Jesse Sightler <[email protected]
> >> > wrote:
>
> >>> I think that could work for most cases.  I'm wondering, though... would
> >>> that actually be easier than a link-report scanner?  It seems like that
> >>> would be the most accurate way to do it.
>
> >>> In any case, I do think that it would work for us.  It would force us to
> >>> remove some non-compilable class files, but I don't really see that as a 
> >>> bad
> >>> thing. :)
>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Jess
>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >>>> Ithink a better approach would be an advanced class scanner... that
> >>>> checks if the .as file is a class, probably just check for class keyword
> >>>> presence....
>
> >>>> What do you think?
>
> >>>> Sent from DROID
>
> >>>> Em 26/07/2010 23:09, "Jesse Sightler" <[email protected]
> >>>> >escreveu:
>
> >>>> LOL, that is fine.  At least the attached patch there gets us past our
> >>>> problem for now.
>
> >>>> We look forward to seeing a more official solution as well. :)
>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Jess
>
> >>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> > You did convinced me this need an different approach, you just didn't
> >>>>> convinced me that the sugg...
>
> >>>>>  --
>
> >>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>>> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> >>>>> > ...
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> >>>> To...
>
> >>>>  --
> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> >>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>
> >>>>http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>
> >>>  --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>
> >>>http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>
> >>  --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>
> >>http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>
> >  --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>
> >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos

http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/

Reply via email to