I'm puzzled : cf. the bug latest update. It's been closed, what they did is that they updated the Hero flex sdk (same version) on opensource.adobe.com download page. They did not bother publishing a newer "version"
Velo would you be kind enough to override your sdk on sonatype nexus repo ? 2010/11/10 João Saleiro <[email protected]> > By the, I was not referring specifically to solving the problem of > 4.5.0.17689, but to take the chance to try working closely with Adobe to see > if it's possible to get an official Maven adoption on the SDK. > > João Saleiro > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [flex-mojos] Re: Flex SDK > 4.5.0.17689 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:54:52 +0000 From: João Saleiro > <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Organization: > Webfuel.pt To: [email protected] > > > > Marvin, from what I know, Adobe is aware of the importance of Maven, and I > believe it's in their plans to address maven properly. > > I know you don't have any direct gain supporting flex-mojos, but you are > right now maybe the most important player on the proper adoption of Maven > for Flex. I advise you to keep close contacts with Deepa (she's the right > person right now to discuss the subject, and she's very balanced), and if > possible tell her *exactly* what Adobe needs to do on the short term and on > the long term. I assure you they will listen and take you in consideration. > I cannot assure they will change their roadmap right now, but there's a > strong possibility that I wouldn't waste. > So, in your spare time, if you can help Adobe helping themselves, you will > be helping all of us - and yourself ;). > > IMHO, of course. :) > > Thank you for your great work, > > João Saleiro > > > On 10-11-2010 20:07, Marvin Froeder wrote: > > Well, Deepa, from adobe, contacted me last night, wanna know why can't I > overlay flex SDK and replubish... mainly: > Idea 2, republish, well, republishing released artifacts cause problems. > This is a maven thing. > Idea 1, nice, but then how to get flexSDK bundle compatible to flexmojos? > What about RSLs, doesn't seem a good way to go. > > Both 1 and 2 will give me more work then it should, and as you said the > situation is already depressing. I will enjoy summer over south hemisphere, > after that I will put my mind on the issue at hand. > > Hopefully people will change Adobe mind by the time I finish my free time > vacation. > > > VELO > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Rupert Key <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yep, I think I speak for the community when I say we: >> - empathize with you and the depressing situation, >> - very much appreciate your doing all of this work (code, admin and >> support), >> - appreciate the irony that your free-to-them work is making their >> products used more! >> - all agree it'd help if Adobe hosted a Maven repo. >> >> Hope your employer recognizes! Please don't give up the good fight! >> >> So, 'nuff of the empathy ;-) What were your thoughts on my other >> suggestions? >> >> Thanks, R. >> >> >> On 10/11/2010 13:41, Marvin Froeder wrote: >> >> I'm honestly evaluating Idea 3: >> Let adobe publish flex SDK.... I'm quite full of dealing with that. >> >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Rupert Key <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Thanks for taking the time to respond, Scott! >>> >>> Velo, could a kludge suffice until Adobe publish? >>> >>> Idea 1: >>> Publish with an interim version number after 17689 to allow Maven to >>> separate it. >>> Problem: I guess that'd screw the generated RSL paths though (if one's >>> using >>> the version info)? >>> >>> Idea 2: >>> Re-publish. >>> Problem: Am I correct in thinking re-publishing with the fix isn't >>> advisable in >>> a public repo? (hence your question to Scott) >>> Last clarifying question: we're OK doing it in our private repos though >>> if we >>> accept the [minimal] risk, right? (not sure I know what risks might be >>> but...!) >>> >>> Idea n? >>> >>> Sorry [as always] for the dumb questions. Just looking to move things >>> forwards >>> (publicly and internally) >>> Thanks, R. >>> >>> On 08/11/2010 19:18, Scott Castle wrote: >>> > Hi Flex Mojos list, >>> > The AIR team is in the process of fixing the issue with Maven and ADT >>> > now. We will be updating the AIR 2.5 SDK with a repackaged adt.jar >>> > that no longer includes the unnecessary jar files from smali/ >>> > backsmali. We currently plan to publish this update to the web on >>> > 11/18/2010. >>> > >>> > Flex SDK users should be able to update their existing Flex SDK by >>> > overlaying the new AIR 2.5.2 SDK over the shipping version. >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > - Scott Castle >>> > >>> > On Nov 7, 6:53 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> I honestly don't expected changes any time soon. Since this is a >>> released >>> >> product, but who knows..... >>> >> >>> >> I hope to be proven wrong, but one week later I still right.... >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Rupert Key <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, Scott >>> >>> May I echo Muji's public thanks for your and Adobe's attention to >>> this (and >>> >>> to >>> >>> Joseph for fixing the integrated JAR quickly, too!). May I ask >>> whether >>> >>> there's >>> >>> any newer update than that posted in the bug, please? Especially >>> with >>> >>> Android >>> >>> capabilities! >>> >>> Thanks, Rupert. >>> >>> On 31/10/2010 18:12, Scott Castle wrote: >>> >>>> Hi folks, >>> >>>> I am a product manager with the AIR team at Adobe. This issue has >>> >>>> been brought to our attention, and our understanding is that it's >>> >>>> caused by the inadvertent inclusion of the jflex-maven-plugin jars >>> in >>> >>>> smali/backsmali. We're taking steps to correct this ASAP in the AIR >>> >>>> SDK, which should resolve the issue identified with the Flex SDK. >>> >>>> Regards, >>> >>>> - Scott >>> >>>> On Oct 25, 6:35 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>> Before anyone asks, flexmojos do not work with this SDK release. >>> >>>>> For some reason adobe decided to embed lots of GPL bytecode into >>> >>> ADT.jar, >>> >>>>> which does break maven classloading. >>> >>>>> When adobe fixes that people can hope to get flexmojos working with >>> this >>> >>> new >>> >>>>> flex SDK. >>> >>>>> Sorry folks, completely out of my hand. >>> >>>>> VELO >>> >>> -- >>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> >>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> >>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> >>> <flex-mojos%2bunsubscr...@googlegrou ps.com> >>> >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>> >>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>> >>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected] >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >> >> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >> >> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > -- François Le Droff http://www.droff.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
