gotcha.

Submiting pullRequest soon.

On 9 fev, 16:48, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> That yes, there is no way to tell if the module will need the same parts as
> the application.
>
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Luiz Rolim 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > just to confirm:
>
> > You mentioned  the RSL, CACHING and Include scopes. How about the
> > compile and Merged Scopes? do we need to keep that?
>
> > On 9 fev, 12:21, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Luiz Rolim <
> > [email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > OK Velo. I´ll try to code that.
>
> > > > PS: I know it´s not related to this but why was autoSortRSL
> > > > deprecated? I´d need that also
> > > > is there any post about it?
>
> > > You must provide libraries on the correct order.
>
> > > > If the problem was performance, I made the code multi-threaded and it
> > > > kinda solved.
>
> > > Can I take a look?
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>
> >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos

http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/

Reply via email to