The bug you pointed is related to flex sdk, not flexmjos On Tuesday, May 10, 2011, sachin_rt <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it fixed for Flex mojos 4.X? > > On May 10, 2:59 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: >> If the workarround didn't worked I have no clue. >> Em 10/05/2011 18:14, "sachin_rt" <[email protected]> escreveu: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I am working on a flex-mojo build for a multi module, multi >> > application(within same flex project) product. After couple of days or >> > work, I ended up with 210 pom files, as there are those many >> > applications. >> >> > My real problem is RSL, >> >> > Lets say I have "Module1", "Module2" and "Application1". In flex >> > builder, "Application1" has dependency on "Module1" and "Module2" as >> > link type : RSL. So, i built "Module1" and "Module2" with flex mojos, >> > and defined appropriate dependency on pom file of "Application1", >> > which again builds fine, but when i host it on tomcat and runs >> > "Application1" it complains that one of the class of "Module1" is not >> > found. >> >> > I then took Application1.swf which was build from Flex Builder and >> > replaced under tomcat webapps and it worked like champ. This makes me >> > think that build of "Module1" and "Module2" are good but "Appliction1" >> > has some problem. Additional i kept generated classes for from flex >> > mojo build and found that Modules are compiling all required classes >> > but somehow scope:RSL in pom file of Application is not working, i >> > tried scope:caching and scope:external from flexmojos... but no luck >> > so far... >> >> > My dependencies looks like following: >> > ================================= >> > <dependencies> >> > <dependency> >> > <groupId>com.alnt.adobe.cairngorm</groupId> >> > <artifactId>cairngorm</artifactId> >> > <version>${cairngorm.product.version}</version> >> > <type>swc</type> >> > <scope>${linkType.caching}</scope> >> > </dependency> >> > <dependency> >> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >> > <artifactId>datavisualization</artifactId> >> > <version>${flex.datavisualization.version}</version> >> > <type>swc</type> >> > <scope>${linkType.caching}</scope> >> > </dependency> >> > <dependency> >> > <groupId>com.alnt.fabric</groupId> >> > <artifactId>ALNTFabricUIFx</artifactId> >> > <version>${alnt.product.version}</version> >> > <type>swc</type> >> > <scope>${linkType.caching}</scope> >> > </dependency> >> > <dependency> >> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >> > <artifactId>framework</artifactId> >> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >> > <type>pom</type> >> > </dependency> >> > </dependencies> >> > ======================================= >> >> > I did generate config report file from flex builder and flex mojos and >> > compared them, I am not seeing any major difference. >> >> > Finally i saw following bug on flex mojo and saw that it is fixed. >> > What version is it fixed on? I am using flex mojo 3.9 and flex sdk >> > 3.2.0.3958 >> >> >https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/FLEXMOJOS-243 >> >> > I tried to apply the work around suggested on this bug, and my >> > dependency is copied above.. >> >> > Any help is greatly appreciated. >> >> > Thanks, >> > sachin_rt >> >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > [email protected] >> > For more options, visit this group at >> >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >> >> > <http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
