Yes, I started with 4.0-beta-7. I've pared back by swf to contain almost literally nothing (a single .mxml with a single label on it!), and it's still giving verify errors when trying to run.
I've cloned from the git repo on github.. my working assumption is if I can make the config output from FM look the same as the one from FB, it ought to work (!), so my first attempts are all about doing that - I'm also though trying to work out why certain things are the way they are (e.g: the flex-framework pom files). On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Christofer Dutz < [email protected]> wrote: > As you are using SNAPSHOT you are using a version you built yourself > ... have you tried 4.0-beta-7? > And if your are building yourself ... which reposirotry are you using? > Subversion or GIT? A lot of descriptions (also on the FM page) > reference the old subversion. You need to use the GIT repository. > > Chris > > 2011/5/16 Nigel Magnay <[email protected]>: > > I set the compiler to be the same - I do this in the master pom: > > <plugin> > > <groupId>org.sonatype.flexmojos</groupId> > > <artifactId>flexmojos-maven-plugin</artifactId> > > <version>4.0-SNAPSHOT</version> > > <extensions>true</extensions> > > <configuration> > > <!--<configurationReport>true</configurationReport>--> > > <debug>true</debug> > > > > </configuration> > > <dependencies> > > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex</groupId> > > <artifactId>compiler</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > <type>pom</type> > > </dependency> > > </dependencies> > > </plugin> > > Then the build itself is is pretty simple, just using : > > <plugin> > > <groupId>org.sonatype.flexmojos</groupId> > > <artifactId>flexmojos-maven-plugin</artifactId> > > <configuration> > > <localesCompiled> > > <locale>en_US</locale> > > </localesCompiled> > > <!--<mergeResourceBundle>true</mergeResourceBundle> > > > > > <resourceBundlePath>src/main/flex/locale/{locale}</resourceBundlePath>--> > > <sourceFile>Base.mxml</sourceFile> > > <rslUrls> > > <url>rsl/{artifactId}-{version}.{extension}</url> > > </rslUrls> > > > > > <staticLinkRuntimeSharedLibraries>false</staticLinkRuntimeSharedLibraries> > > <!--<themes>--> > > > > <!--<theme>${project.build.directory}/themes/halo-theme.swc</theme>--> > > > > <!--<theme>${project.build.directory}/themes/spark-theme.css</theme>--> > > <!--</themes>--> > > > <!--<generateHtmlWrapper>true</generateHtmlWrapper>--> > > <defines> > > <property> > > <name>RT::version</name> > > <value>"${project.version}"</value> > > </property> > > <property> > > <name>RT::revision</name> > > <value>"${buildNumber}"</value> > > </property> > > <property> > > <name>RT::build</name> > > <value>"${hudson.build.number}"</value> > > </property> > > </defines> > > > > > > </configuration> > > </plugin> > > </plugins> > > </build> > > <dependencies> > > <!-- flex, standard --> > > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > > <artifactId>flex-framework</artifactId> > > <type>pom</type> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > </dependency> > > This has been working fine previously up to 4.1.0. > > Have you had FM working with 4.5.0 ? > > I'm busy tracing down differences between FB4.5 outputted config XML, and > > the XML generated from flexMojos. So far I've noticed that the > > flex-framework pom that is included references virtually everything > (through > > flex-compiler) through common-framework with a scope that isn't RSL. So > I've > > made a parallel flex-framework config that matches what FB4.5 does; I've > > added (by hand, and by patching flexmojos) to get equivalent entries > > in runtime-shared-library-settings.application-domain. As an aside, why > is > > this the case? Don't most people want to link to the framework as a RSL? > > The two things that are still different that I'm now trying :- > > * All the (framework) SWCs that I'm referencing also appear in > > <external-library-path> entries. I don't see why this would affect the > > output, but maybe it does. > > * The FB4.5 config additionally references a > > > load-config: <load-config>${flexlib}/${configname}-config.xml</load-config> > > I assume this file is the flash builder > > "/sdks/4.5.0/frameworks/flex-config.xml" file, which contains some > > interesting entries such as rsl-urls for downloading .swz files from > adobe. > > Again, not sure if this is what's breaking it, but will be giving it a > try.. > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Christofer Dutz > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> You have to match the dependency of the compiler (plugin dependency) > >> to the framework version you are using. > >> Could you please post your complete pom? > >> > >> Chris > >> > >> > >> > >> 2011/5/15 Nigel Magnay <[email protected]>: > >> > Ah - ok - this looks like something big has changed in the SDK API. > >> > Just creating a simple project in FB4 vs FB4.5 produces quite > different > >> > config xml files (attached). > >> > I notice comparing the -config output of FB4.5 vs what I get from > >> > flexmojos, > >> > they're quite different. I'm including the framework with the pom > stanza > >> > <dependency> > >> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > >> > <artifactId>flex-framework</artifactId> > >> > <type>pom</type> > >> > </dependency> > >> > Now, I trace down the common-framework pom and I can see that all the > >> > dependencies in there are declared as <type>swc</type>, when it > strikes > >> > me > >> > that most of them ought perhaps to be <type>rsl</type>, and they need > to > >> > get > >> > put in the 'default' application > >> > (runtime-shared-library-settings.application-domain - I don't know id > >> > this > >> > would default to 'default' however) > >> > So it's probably that the FB4.5 framework RSLs don't like being > included > >> > as > >> > SWCs in this way.. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Nigel Magnay <[email protected] > > > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hm - OK, I think it's broken but I'm not sure why. > >> >> The resulting flex-config xml files look pretty similar; the 4.5 > >> >> version > >> >> has added a few library-path path-elements like advancedgrids.swc; > it's > >> >> also > >> >> added the halo theme, but otherwise nothing suspicious. > >> >> If I run the resultant SWFs through swfdump they look similar. > >> >> Setting AS3Trace=1 in mm.cfg, I can see that the 4.5 build dies here: > >> >> > >> >> 693 AVMINF: MTHD flash.events::Event/get target () > >> >> > >> >> 693 AVMINF: MTHD flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction > () > >> >> > >> >> 694 AVMINF: MTHD > >> >> mx.preloaders::SparkDownloadProgressBar/initProgressHandler () > >> >> > >> >> 694 AVMINF: MTHD global/flash.utils::getTimer () > >> >> > >> >> 694 AVMINF: MTHD global/flash.utils::getTimer () > >> >> > >> >> 694 AVMINF: MTHD > >> >> mx.preloaders::SparkDownloadProgressBar/showDisplayForInit () > >> >> The equivalent 4.1 code was doing > >> >> > >> >> 1114 AVMINF: MTHD flash.events::Event/get target () > >> >> > >> >> 1115 AVMINF: MTHD flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction > >> >> () > >> >> > >> >> 1115 AVMINF: MTHD > >> >> mx.preloaders::SparkDownloadProgressBar/initProgressHandler () > >> >> > >> >> 1115 AVMINF: MTHD global/flash.utils::getTimer () > >> >> > >> >> 1115 AVMINF: MTHD > >> >> mx.preloaders::SparkDownloadProgressBar/showDisplayForInit () > >> >> > >> >> 1133 AVMINF: MTHD flash.events::Event () > >> >> > >> >> 1133 AVMINF: MTHD flash.events::Event/ctor () > >> >> > >> >> 1133 AVMINF: MTHD mx.managers::LayoutManager/waitAFrame () > >> >> > >> >> 1134 AVMINF: MTHD mx.managers::SystemManager/removeEventListener () > >> >> > >> >> 1134 AVMINF: MTHD flash.events::EventDispatcher/hasEventListener () > >> >> > >> >> 1134 AVMINF: MTHD flash.events::EventDispatcher/removeEventListener > () > >> >> > >> >> Which doesn't help me that much. > >> >> I'll keep digging. > >> >> > >> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> No clue, I haven't tried 4.5.0 at all. > >> >>> > >> >>> Em 15/05/2011 09:27, "Nigel Magnay" <[email protected]> > escreveu: > >> >>> > I tried a really simple SWF, and it seems to bomb in the player > >> >>> > (debug > >> >>> > out: Warning: > >> >>> > 'flash' has no property 'prototype') > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Works fine if I roll back to 4.1.0.16076, but was wondering if > >> >>> > there's > >> >>> > some > >> >>> > option I'm missing before I start digging.. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > -- > >> >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> >>> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > >> >>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > >> >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> >>> > [email protected] > >> >>> > For more options, visit this group at > >> >>> > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > >> >>> > > >> >>> > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> >>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > >> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > >> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> >>> [email protected] > >> >>> For more options, visit this group at > >> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > >> >>> > >> >>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > >> >> > >> > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > [email protected] > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > >> > > >> > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> [email protected] > >> For more options, visit this group at > >> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > >> > >> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > > > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
