It's matching the dep order. The following file is the culprit: https://repository.sonatype.org/service/local/repositories/flex/content/com/adobe/flex/framework/common-framework/4.5.0.20967/common-framework-4.5.0.20967.pom
I don't think that order is correct (it's not what FB4.5 uses anyway..) - particularly spark is before textLayout. On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > For mvn dependency:list order match FM-config.xml order? > > If so that is the expected behavior and you provided the dependency at > incorrect order. > > > VELO > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Nigel Magnay <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Ok - so I have found the magic incantation to correctly build my SWF. But >> this is not all good news... >> >> I started tweaking the config by hand, steadily adjusting the FM generated >> config xml with diffs from the FB config my using mxmlc -load-config from >> the commandline. >> >> By looking at the flashlog and what was being requested using firebug, I >> became suspicious that the error was due to something not being loaded in >> the right order. >> >> In my <runtime-shared-library-path/>, the elements appear to be in >> alphabetical order. >> I adjusted this to move framework and textLayout to be the first two in >> the list and - bang - it worked! >> >> So it looks like it really cares about the order of the framework >> libraries. >> >> What I don't know is if this is a regression in flex, or if it has always >> been like that. I don't understand why the framework doesn't correctly take >> care of the instantiation order (After all, is that not what metadata is >> for!), or whether it is perhaps just some missing information in the spark >> swc that it depends on textLayout... does anyone have any deeper >> understanding of the mechanics at work ? >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Christofer Dutz < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Ok ... was just an idea. >>> >>> Perhaps Velo is right and 4.5 simply doen't work because Adobe changed >>> things again :-( >>> >>> Chis >>> >>> 2011/5/16 Nigel Magnay <[email protected]>: >>> > Yes, I started with 4.0-beta-7. >>> > I've pared back by swf to contain almost literally nothing (a single >>> .mxml >>> > with a single label on it!), and it's still giving verify errors when >>> trying >>> > to run. >>> > I've cloned from the git repo on github.. my working assumption is if I >>> can >>> > make the config output from FM look the same as the one from FB, it >>> ought to >>> > work (!), so my first attempts are all about doing that - I'm also >>> though >>> > trying to work out why certain things are the way they are (e.g: the >>> > flex-framework pom files). >>> > >>> > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Christofer Dutz >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> As you are using SNAPSHOT you are using a version you built yourself >>> >> ... have you tried 4.0-beta-7? >>> >> And if your are building yourself ... which reposirotry are you using? >>> >> Subversion or GIT? A lot of descriptions (also on the FM page) >>> >> reference the old subversion. You need to use the GIT repository. >>> >> >>> >> Chris >>> >> >>> >> 2011/5/16 Nigel Magnay <[email protected]>: >>> >> > I set the compiler to be the same - I do this in the master pom: >>> >> > <plugin> >>> >> > <groupId>org.sonatype.flexmojos</groupId> >>> >> > <artifactId>flexmojos-maven-plugin</artifactId> >>> >> > <version>4.0-SNAPSHOT</version> >>> >> > <extensions>true</extensions> >>> >> > <configuration> >>> >> > <!--<configurationReport>true</configurationReport>--> >>> >> > <debug>true</debug> >>> >> > >>> >> > </configuration> >>> >> > <dependencies> >>> >> > <dependency> >>> >> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex</groupId> >>> >> > <artifactId>compiler</artifactId> >>> >> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >>> >> > <type>pom</type> >>> >> > </dependency> >>> >> > </dependencies> >>> >> > </plugin> >>> >> > Then the build itself is is pretty simple, just using : >>> >> > <plugin> >>> >> > <groupId>org.sonatype.flexmojos</groupId> >>> >> > <artifactId>flexmojos-maven-plugin</artifactId> >>> >> > <configuration> >>> >> > <localesCompiled> >>> >> > <locale>en_US</locale> >>> >> > </localesCompiled> >>> >> > >>> <!--<mergeResourceBundle>true</mergeResourceBundle> >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> <resourceBundlePath>src/main/flex/locale/{locale}</resourceBundlePath>--> >>> >> > <sourceFile>Base.mxml</sourceFile> >>> >> > <rslUrls> >>> >> > >>> >> > <url>rsl/{artifactId}-{version}.{extension}</url> >>> >> > </rslUrls> >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> <staticLinkRuntimeSharedLibraries>false</staticLinkRuntimeSharedLibraries> >>> >> > <!--<themes>--> >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> <!--<theme>${project.build.directory}/themes/halo-theme.swc</theme>--> >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> <!--<theme>${project.build.directory}/themes/spark-theme.css</theme>--> >>> >> > <!--</themes>--> >>> >> > >>> >> > <!--<generateHtmlWrapper>true</generateHtmlWrapper>--> >>> >> > <defines> >>> >> > <property> >>> >> > <name>RT::version</name> >>> >> > <value>"${project.version}"</value> >>> >> > </property> >>> >> > <property> >>> >> > <name>RT::revision</name> >>> >> > <value>"${buildNumber}"</value> >>> >> > </property> >>> >> > <property> >>> >> > <name>RT::build</name> >>> >> > <value>"${hudson.build.number}"</value> >>> >> > </property> >>> >> > </defines> >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > </configuration> >>> >> > </plugin> >>> >> > </plugins> >>> >> > </build> >>> >> > <dependencies> >>> >> > <!-- flex, standard --> >>> >> > <dependency> >>> >> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >>> >> > <artifactId>flex-framework</artifactId> >>> >> > <type>pom</type> >>> >> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> >>> >> > </dependency> >>> >> > This has been working fine previously up to 4.1.0. >>> >> > Have you had FM working with 4.5.0 ? >>> >> > I'm busy tracing down differences between FB4.5 outputted config >>> XML, >>> >> > and >>> >> > the XML generated from flexMojos. So far I've noticed that the >>> >> > flex-framework pom that is included references virtually everything >>> >> > (through >>> >> > flex-compiler) through common-framework with a scope that isn't RSL. >>> So >>> >> > I've >>> >> > made a parallel flex-framework config that matches what FB4.5 does; >>> I've >>> >> > added (by hand, and by patching flexmojos) to get equivalent entries >>> >> > in runtime-shared-library-settings.application-domain. As an aside, >>> why >>> >> > is >>> >> > this the case? Don't most people want to link to the framework as a >>> RSL? >>> >> > The two things that are still different that I'm now trying :- >>> >> > * All the (framework) SWCs that I'm referencing also appear in >>> >> > <external-library-path> entries. I don't see why this would affect >>> the >>> >> > output, but maybe it does. >>> >> > * The FB4.5 config additionally references a >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> load-config: <load-config>${flexlib}/${configname}-config.xml</load-config> >>> >> > I assume this file is the flash builder >>> >> > "/sdks/4.5.0/frameworks/flex-config.xml" file, which contains some >>> >> > interesting entries such as rsl-urls for downloading .swz files from >>> >> > adobe. >>> >> > Again, not sure if this is what's breaking it, but will be giving it >>> a >>> >> > try.. >>> >> > >>> >> > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Christofer Dutz >>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> You have to match the dependency of the compiler (plugin >>> dependency) >>> >> >> to the framework version you are using. >>> >> >> Could you please post your complete pom? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Chris >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> 2011/5/15 Nigel Magnay <[email protected]>: >>> >> >> > Ah - ok - this looks like something big has changed in the SDK >>> API. >>> >> >> > Just creating a simple project in FB4 vs FB4.5 produces quite >>> >> >> > different >>> >> >> > config xml files (attached). >>> >> >> > I notice comparing the -config output of FB4.5 vs what I get from >>> >> >> > flexmojos, >>> >> >> > they're quite different. I'm including the framework with the pom >>> >> >> > stanza >>> >> >> > <dependency> >>> >> >> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> >>> >> >> > <artifactId>flex-framework</artifactId> >>> >> >> > <type>pom</type> >>> >> >> > </dependency> >>> >> >> > Now, I trace down the common-framework pom and I can see that all >>> the >>> >> >> > dependencies in there are declared as <type>swc</type>, when it >>> >> >> > strikes >>> >> >> > me >>> >> >> > that most of them ought perhaps to be <type>rsl</type>, and they >>> need >>> >> >> > to >>> >> >> > get >>> >> >> > put in the 'default' application >>> >> >> > (runtime-shared-library-settings.application-domain - I don't >>> know id >>> >> >> > this >>> >> >> > would default to 'default' however) >>> >> >> > So it's probably that the FB4.5 framework RSLs don't like being >>> >> >> > included >>> >> >> > as >>> >> >> > SWCs in this way.. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Nigel Magnay >>> >> >> > <[email protected]> >>> >> >> > wrote: >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Hm - OK, I think it's broken but I'm not sure why. >>> >> >> >> The resulting flex-config xml files look pretty similar; the 4.5 >>> >> >> >> version >>> >> >> >> has added a few library-path path-elements like >>> advancedgrids.swc; >>> >> >> >> it's >>> >> >> >> also >>> >> >> >> added the halo theme, but otherwise nothing suspicious. >>> >> >> >> If I run the resultant SWFs through swfdump they look similar. >>> >> >> >> Setting AS3Trace=1 in mm.cfg, I can see that the 4.5 build dies >>> >> >> >> here: >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 693 AVMINF: MTHD flash.events::Event/get target () >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 693 AVMINF: MTHD >>> flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction >>> >> >> >> () >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 694 AVMINF: MTHD >>> >> >> >> mx.preloaders::SparkDownloadProgressBar/initProgressHandler () >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 694 AVMINF: MTHD global/flash.utils::getTimer () >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 694 AVMINF: MTHD global/flash.utils::getTimer () >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 694 AVMINF: MTHD >>> >> >> >> mx.preloaders::SparkDownloadProgressBar/showDisplayForInit () >>> >> >> >> The equivalent 4.1 code was doing >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 1114 AVMINF: MTHD flash.events::Event/get target () >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 1115 AVMINF: MTHD >>> >> >> >> flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction >>> >> >> >> () >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 1115 AVMINF: MTHD >>> >> >> >> mx.preloaders::SparkDownloadProgressBar/initProgressHandler () >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 1115 AVMINF: MTHD global/flash.utils::getTimer () >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 1115 AVMINF: MTHD >>> >> >> >> mx.preloaders::SparkDownloadProgressBar/showDisplayForInit () >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 1133 AVMINF: MTHD flash.events::Event () >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 1133 AVMINF: MTHD flash.events::Event/ctor () >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 1133 AVMINF: MTHD mx.managers::LayoutManager/waitAFrame () >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 1134 AVMINF: MTHD mx.managers::SystemManager/removeEventListener >>> () >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 1134 AVMINF: MTHD flash.events::EventDispatcher/hasEventListener >>> () >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 1134 AVMINF: MTHD >>> flash.events::EventDispatcher/removeEventListener >>> >> >> >> () >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Which doesn't help me that much. >>> >> >> >> I'll keep digging. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Marvin Froeder <velo.br@ >>> gmail.com> >>> >> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> No clue, I haven't tried 4.5.0 at all. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> Em 15/05/2011 09:27, "Nigel Magnay" <[email protected]> >>> >> >> >>> escreveu: >>> >> >> >>> > I tried a really simple SWF, and it seems to bomb in the >>> player >>> >> >> >>> > (debug >>> >> >> >>> > out: Warning: >>> >> >> >>> > 'flash' has no property 'prototype') >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> > Works fine if I roll back to 4.1.0.16076, but was wondering >>> if >>> >> >> >>> > there's >>> >> >> >>> > some >>> >> >> >>> > option I'm missing before I start digging.. >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> > -- >>> >> >> >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>> >> >> >>> > Google >>> >> >> >>> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>> >> >> >>> > To post to this group, send email to >>> [email protected] >>> >> >> >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> >> >> >>> > [email protected] >>> >> >> >>> > For more options, visit this group at >>> >> >> >>> > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> -- >>> >> >> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>> Google >>> >> >> >>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>> >> >> >>> To post to this group, send email to >>> [email protected] >>> >> >> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> >> >> >>> [email protected] >>> >> >> >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> >> >> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > -- >>> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>> Google >>> >> >> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>> >> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> >> >> > [email protected] >>> >> >> > For more options, visit this group at >>> >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> -- >>> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> >> >> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>> >> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> >> >> [email protected] >>> >> >> For more options, visit this group at >>> >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>> >> >> >>> >> >> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>> >> > >>> >> > -- >>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> >> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> >> > [email protected] >>> >> > For more options, visit this group at >>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>> >> > >>> >> > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> >> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> >> [email protected] >>> >> For more options, visit this group at >>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>> >> >>> >> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>> > >>> > -- >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> > [email protected] >>> > For more options, visit this group at >>> > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>> > >>> > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected] >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >>> >>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected] >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >> >> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
