Did you tried installind it manually? On Sep 19, 10:47 am, Remi P <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Sorry to reply to this old post, but I'm facing a similar issue with signed > RSLs. > > It seems that copy-flex-resources works fine when swz artefacts are > deployed in the repository but many versions don't contain the swz > artefacts. For example version 4.6.b.23201 (the last stable version form > Adobe) doesn't include swz artefacts. Did you have any workaround which > could allow us to provide our own swz artefacts to FM? Or much better: do > you have write permissions to deploy artefacts in the flex sonatype repo > (but I don't know if it's an heavy task)? > > Regards > > Rémi > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Christofer Dutz < > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > In our case we never actually added an adobe rsl url. Even if we were > > using signed rsls. The copy-flex-resources nicely copies the swz files > > to the location I provided in the rslUrl. The Flashplayer has no > > problem with loading them from my server as it trusts them because of > > their signature. > > > You could say that loading them from Adobe could reduce traffic on > > your server in real life, but on the downside you would be dependent > > on Adobe hosting the swz files on the same url (Imagine the Java SDK > > depending on a Sun Url). Usually I trust my own server most :-) > > > If you want to load the rsls from Adobe I see no real way to optimize > > besides eventually changing the order of the rsls to check your server > > first and Adobes servers after that. If you now remove the Adobe rsls > > and swzs then the application would try to load them from your server > > first - this would fail - and then it would try Adobes server. When > > loading your application modules however your Server would immediately > > serve them. > > > I have to admit that I like the "load everything from your own server" > > approach a lot more than the other one. > > > Just to add my 50ct to the discussion. > > > Chris > > > 2012/4/10 [email protected] <[email protected]>: > > > Hi, I have more or less the same issue. > > > > Did you find any workaround ? > > > > Thanks, > > > BQ. > > > > On Monday, September 26, 2011 7:19:15 AM UTC+2, J_A_X wrote: > > > >> I'm wondering if it's possible to fix a smallish issue with the > > >> compilation process. I set my RSL url like this: > > > >> <rslUrls> > > > >> <url> > >http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/{extension}/flex/${flex.sdk.version}/{artifactId}_{version}.{extension} > > </url> > > >> <url>rsls/{artifactId}-{version}.{extension}</url> > > >> </rslUrls> > > > >> The first is of course to get the flex framework cached RSLs, and the > > >> second is for local RSLs. This of course works fine, but my problem > > comes > > >> with the config.xml that gets created: > > > >> <runtime-shared-library-path> > > > <path-element>C:\Users\mboudreau\.m2\repository\com\adobe\flex\framework\framework\4.5.1.21328\framework-4.5.1.21328.swc</path-element> > > > >> <rsl-url> > >http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/flex/4.5.1.21328/framework_4.5.1.... > > </rsl-url> > > > >> <policy-file-url>http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/crossdomain.xml > > </policy-file-url> > > >> <rsl-url>rsls/framework-4.5.1.21328.swz</rsl-url> > > >> </runtime-shared-library-path> > > > >> So it would look in both location for the RSL file, for all RSLs. This > > >> isn't much an issue with the Flex RSL, but it does become one when > > trying to > > >> load my local RSLs since it always look at the adobe site first. When > > I'm > > >> testing this in my browser, it seems that it takes a few seconds longer > > to > > >> load my application when using this method because it needs to wait for > > the > > >> request to come back before going to the next url. > > > >> I was hoping that there might be a way to fix this to have only one > > >> specific url per RSL so that it doesn't have to go through each rslUrl. > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected] > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > > >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
