RE: [flexcoders] Flex SWF in Zinc

[Matt Chotin]

I believe the first option is the way to do it according to the existing EULA (though I’m no lawyer).  The 2nd way would require a special agreement I think.   If you have a special reason for wanting to do something like this I’d mail Libby and Lucian and they can work with you to make appropriate arrangements if possible.   Matt   From: JesterXL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 14, 20058:35 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flex SWF in Zinc   To expound on what you just said:   - is using the Zinc projector to load the SWF from a remote URL legal? (Peter's way he tested) - is using the Zinc projector to wrap the SWF locally by getting a local copy of the SWF generated from a Flex server (way I've tested) legal?   The first uses a Flex server, upon the user running the EXE.   The second uses a Flex server to get a local copyof the SWF that you then compile into a Zinc exe, making it self-contained and have no need of a Flex server.   ----- Original Message ----- From: peter blazejewicz To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 11:18 AM Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flex SWF in Zinc   Hi Jessie, I wondered about the same licensing question when I've been testing Flex inside ZINC, I've simply use .exe as shell container for .swf served from Flex just likein browser , thanx for asking that, regards Peter, MDM Support Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] JesterXL wrote: Is wrapping a Flex SWF using Zinc, and distributing the EXE ok via the EULA? Aral Balkan brought this up to me after I told him my progress on a project, and thought I'd ask.   I wrote a small GUI for NaturalDocs (naturaldocs.org) since it's only command line.  I used Zinc as the wrapper since Central cannot get folder paths.   Thanks in advance if you can help!   --JesterXL