Well I got side tracked with
working on something else last week, so I had to put this experiment on
hold.
So I got back to it today and
tried adding the crossdomain.xml files to both domains as Matt suggested, but
that doesn't work.
You are correct, using the
ServiceLocator in a UI within UI scenario makes it use the service.mxml used by
the parent UI. I then tried to hardcode the AS2 delegate to use the
services.mxml specified in the child UI and that doesn't seem to be working
either.
So I guess when in a UI within
UI scenario, you have to specify all RO objects within the parent UI only and
that should do the trick... however that is not what I am interested
in.
Jimmy
Gianninas
Software Developer -
Optimal Payments
Inc.
From: james_d_mercer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 1:35 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: RemoteObjects and UI within UI problem
P.S. In addition to my last post:
Do you have a services file in your parent app and another one in
your child app? If so, that would be your first problem. The
ServiceLocator class with throw an exception if it is created
twice :) good luck!
Dustin Mercer
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Dimitrios Gianninas"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dustin,
>
> Thanks for sharing that information. Yes I did run into the
width/height
> troubles, but I saw that setting the exact width and height of the
> nighthawk.mxml caused it to appear properly when loaded within the
> phoenix.mxml.
>
> Now back to the problem, one thing I forgot to mention the first
time
> around was that since I am using Cairngorm, I have the following
> declaration in the nighthawk.mxml:
>
> <core:Services id="services" />
>
> Which is a component that contains all my RemoteObject
definitions. If
> I leave that line in the nighthawk.mxml, when loaded into Phoenix,
> nothing appears. Remove that line and it does appear. I then took
the
> single RO and put it directly in the nighthawk.mxml and was doing
> Application.application.queryServices to use it, but like you
explained
> below, using Application.application in a UI within a UI scenario
> references the top level UI and thus does not work. So anyways, I
tried
> to work around this in several ways and it still doesn't work, the
UI
> loads via the Loader, but no remote calls every get made.
>
> You are right however, the Loader component may need some
enhancement. I
> am using it now in this fashion in order to accomplish single sign
on.
> Also, I know that the child UI can reference the parent UI, but
there
> does not seem to be a specific way for the parent to tell the
child to
> do something (or invoke a method on it).
>
> Did you ever get it to work at all in your case?
>
> Jimmy Gianninas
> Software Developer - Optimal Payments Inc.
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Mercer, Dustin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 7:48 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [flexcoders] RemoteObjects and UI within UI problem
>
>
>
> I had hit some of the same problems. A possible solution may be
because
> you are referencing mx.core.Application.application from within
your
> result handler of the remote object. When using a loader, if you
> reference mx.core.Application.application from within
nighthawk.mxml
> (Child Component), it actually points to the
> mx.core.Application.application of phoenix.mxml (Parent
Application).
> It is because of static variable issues between the apps. Loader
is
> extremely cool, but IMHO unusable for what you are trying to
accomplish.
> Macromedia has to give some sort of new component, revamp the
loader, or
> give us guidelines on using loaders properly. I had the same
issues
> when I tried to accomplish this. Maybe someone else has some
> suggestions on how to get loaders working properly:-).
>
>
>
> P.S. there are also major sizing issues if you want to use
percentage
> widths and heights on an application being loaded from a loader.
Just
> FYI
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Dimitrios Gianninas
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 10:47 AM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] RemoteObjects and UI within UI problem
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Just been playing around with having one Flex UI within another
and I am
> experiencing a little problem, and thus I was wondering if anyone
has
> come across this problem and might have a solution.
>
>
>
> This is all under JRun 4 SP4... so we have the parent UI at
> http://localhost:8200/phoenix/phoenix.mxml and the child UI at
> http://localhost:8204/nighthawk/nighthawk.mxml
>
>
>
> Now using the loader component in phoenix.mxml I am able to load
the
> nighthawk.mxml, no problem, it appears. However when I hit a
button to
> perform an action which makes a remote call (via RemoteObject)
nothing
> happens. The nighthawk.mxml works perfectly on its own however.
>
>
>
> Anyone have any insight?
>
>
>
> Jimmy Gianninas
>
> Software Developer - Optimal Payments Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
> click here
>
<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=1292d0h6l/M=298184.6191685.7192823.30011
76/
>
D=groups/S=1705007207:HM/EXP=1111279701/A=2593423/R=0/SIG=11el9gslf/*
htt
> p://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60190075>
>
> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?
M=298184.6191685.7192823.3001176/D=group
> s/S=:HM/A=2593423/rand=740704448>
>
> _____
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
| Yahoo! Groups Sponsor | |
|
|
Yahoo! Groups Links
- To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
