RE: [flexcoders] Flex and Load Balancing

Wed, 25 May 2005 07:44:13 -0700

Hi Leif,
 
All Flex remoting calls are AMF over HTTP/S, so should seamlessly integrate with your load balancer. The problem with RMI will have been was that it was not going over HTTP. 
 
I've not actually used Flex with Radware, but I'd be very surprised if there were any issues.
 
Regards,
 
Alistair
 
--
Alistair McLeod
Development Director
iteration::two
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Office:  +44 (0)131 338 6108
 
This e-mail and any associated attachments transmitted with it may contain confidential information and must not be copied, or disclosed, or used by anyone other than the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please destroy this e-mail, and any copies of it, immediately.
 
Please also note that while software systems have been used to try to ensure that this e-mail has been swept for viruses, iteration::two do not accept responsibility for any damage or loss caused in respect of any viruses transmitted by the e-mail. Please ensure your own checks are carried out before any attachments are opened.
 
 

From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leif Wells
Sent: 25 May 2005 15:34
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Flex and Load Balancing

We'd like to use Flex in an enterprise deployment, where all HTTP requests are handled and dispatched by a Radware load balancer.

We are getting a bit of push-back from our client. Our client has seen in the past that the Radware load balancers don't work exactly as expected when tunnelling other protocols over HTTP (
e.g. Java RMI).  We want to make sure that the Radware load balancers can handle Flex invocations over HTTP without any problems. These guys need pertinent information to relieve risk-based stress. ;-)

Do any of you have any data that indicates that Radware load balancers are fully compatible with Flex remoting?


Special thanks,

Leif
a.k.a., JesterXL's manager


Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to