There are quite a few constructs that turned out to be extremely expensive to put in the schema. In theory, none of them would prevent validation of your document, they would only be unavailable for hinting. As it is, the schema is horribly complex but represents a reasonable compromise in correctness vs. usefulness.
If you bump into certain limitations, you are welcome to add them, but be aware that small changes to the schema can make it unusable for run-time hinting in many tools. -Roger Roger Gonzalez mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Reto M. Kiefer > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 3:18 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] MXML Schema > > Hi Blake, > > > As I learned earlier (see ColumnChart thread), the lower-case tags > > aren't objects but shortcuts for defining properties of the > parent tag. > > So, as in that ColumnChart thread, this code: > > Thnaks for your replay, I didn't studied the thread "ColumnChart" > intensivly because right now I'm far away from developing a charting > application... > > But nevertheless regardless if the lowercase-tags are objects or > shourtcuts for the parent's attributes they should be provided within > the xml schema definition, but they aren't. I studied the schema > carefully, they don't appear neither as attributes to their > parent tags > nor as alowed children tags. > > Cheers > > Reto > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
