On 6/16/05, Brian Deitte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Clint, you can't use interfaces as the name of the source in RemoteObject, since we do a Class.forName() call for the name. It's really not possible for such a thing to ever work, since something needs to be instantiated for the RemoteObject. You should be able to use a class that implements an interface, though. -Brian
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Clint Modien
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 10:09 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Java intefaces as remote objects?Instead of using POJO's can we use Java Intefaces definitions instead?When a guy on our team tested it he got a class instantiation error...If the answer is no then I gess I could add it to the wish list for 2.0.Thanks
Yahoo! Groups Links
- To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Links
- To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
