OK - I changed one module by removing the imports - now the module doesnt load and I dont see any compile errors.
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There's an "Under the hood: Application Domain" slide in the > presentation. It tries to show you that once you get StockVO in the > main apps' AppDom, all modules will use that definition and won't use or > need their own in the module. > > > > ________________________________ > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of donald_d_hook > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 6:58 AM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Type Cast Error > > > > In order to use the StockVO object, I will have to have a definition > of it in the module - in order to use it. I guess I am not sure if I > will be right back where I started with the original problem. > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > , "Alex Harui" <aharui@> wrote: > > > > Essentially, the actuall classname isn't StockVO, it is > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] If the portion > > after the @ matches it is effectively stripped off so you can just see > > and use StockVO in most places > > > > > > > > So it doesn't really match. This will be extremely useful in Flex 3.2 > > when you can mix sub-application built with different versions of > Flex, > > but is a pain for module users like yourself. > > > > > > > > Of course, the easiest way to use StockVO in both modules is to get it > > linked into the main app. Most VOs are small so it won't matter. The > > SharedCode Module pattern is for heavy things. > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > ] On > > Behalf Of donald_d_hook > > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 5:52 PM > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Type Cast Error > > > > > > > > Alex - > > > > I looked at your presentation. I am using the StockVO in both pages > > (both modules). I need to use it in both. If I define the class in > > both places, what does it matter, its the same class? > > > > I saw where you mentioned having common code by loading a "Shared > > Code" swf that would apply to ALL modules. I guess I can give that a > > shot. > > > > Thanks again for your time! > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > , "Alex Harui" <aharui@> wrote: > > > > > > It is picking up the class from a different application domain. See > > the > > > modules presentation on my blog. > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > ] On > > > Behalf Of donald_d_hook > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:22 AM > > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > > Subject: [flexcoders] Type Cast Error > > > > > > > > > > > > I receive a type cast error when I try to cast an object I received > > > from the server (an arraycollection of value objects). I get the > > > following: > > > > > > TypeError: Error #1034: Type Coercion failed: cannot convert > > > com.spinnaker.model::[EMAIL PROTECTED] to com.spinnaker.model.StockVO > > > > > > The actionscript object has the correct remoteClass. On top of that, > > > this only happens the 2nd time into the page. Not sure what is > > > happening behind the scenes, nor do I know what the @3b392b81 is. > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > >
