I've seen some issues like that as well. We just ported a large Java project to Flash and came across all sorts of this stuff. If you're interested at all, there are a series of posts I wrote up at http://blog.sharendipity.com/.
I even wrote one about using the Proxy class for implementing a few design patterns: http://blog.sharendipity.com/moving-to-flash-part-4. Although, it turns out it's not as efficient as creating an inner class, but that poses problems with non-public access as well. I digress... Glad I could help, Dale --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Nate Beck" <n...@...> wrote: > > Hey Dale, > That makes sense... and thanks for your reply. > > Making the DateTime class dynamic fixed the issue. > > Weird thing is that without the dynamic keyword sometimes it will compile, > and sometimes it won't. > > Anyways thanks! > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:40 AM, cadisella <beerm...@...> wrote: > > > I've ran into this before. I think that you just want to declare your > > class as dynamic. > > > > -Dale > > > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, "Nate > > Beck" <nate@> wrote: > > > > > > So this is kind of annoying, I have a proxy Class that I am working > > with... > > > here is a trimmed down version of it. > > > > > > -- DateTime.as (Trimmed version) -- > > > > > > package net.natebeck.core > > > { > > > import com.flexoop.utilities.dateutils.DaylightSavingTimeUS; > > > import flash.utils.Proxy; > > > import flash.utils.flash_proxy; > > > public class DateTime extends Proxy > > > { > > > // Instance Variables > > > protected var _date:Date; > > > protected var _timezone:Timezone; > > > > > > public function DateTime(... args) > > > { > > > super(); > > > _date = new Date(args[0]); > > > if(args[0] is String) > > > setTimezone(parseTimezone(args[0])); > > > } > > > public function setTimezone(value:Timezone):void > > > { > > > trace("Setting Timezone: "+value); > > > _timezone = value; > > > } > > > public function getTimezone():Timezone > > > { > > > trace("Getting Timezone: "+_timezone); > > > return _timezone; > > > } > > > public function getTimezoneOffset():Number > > > { > > > return _timezone.offset; > > > } > > > override flash_proxy function callProperty(methodName:*, ... args):* > > > { > > > var res:*; > > > switch (methodName.toString()) > > > { > > > case 'toString': > > > res = "foobar"; > > > break; > > > default: > > > res = _date[methodName].apply(_date, args); > > > break; > > > } > > > return res; > > > } > > > override flash_proxy function getProperty(name:*):* { > > > trace("getting property: "+name); > > > return _date[name]; > > > } > > > override flash_proxy function setProperty(name:*, value:*):void { > > > _date[name] = value; > > > } > > > } > > > } > > > > > > I've written a simple test application to test my DateTime Proxy > > class while > > > I'm developing. > > > > > > -- TestDateTime.as -- > > > > > > package > > > { > > > import flash.display.Sprite; > > > import net.natebeck.core.DateTime; > > > import net.natebeck.core.Timezone; > > > public class TestDateTime extends Sprite > > > { > > > public function TestDateTime() > > > { > > > var create:Object = "Jun 17 12:00:00 GMT-0500 2009"; > > > var oldDate:Date = new Date(create); > > > var strDate:DateTime = new DateTime(create); > > > trace("old: "+oldDate); > > > trace("new: "+strDate); > > > > > > strDate.getTimezone(); > > > strDate.setTimezone(Timezone.PST); > > > strDate.getTimezone(); > > > trace(strDate.toString()); > > > } > > > } > > > } > > > > > > When trying to compile using FlexBuilder I get this error. > > > > > > 1061: Call to a possibly undefined method toString through a > > reference with > > > static type net.natebeck.core:DateTime. > > > > > > Well that's dumb... the whole reason I'm using the Proxy class is so > > I don't > > > have to re-write every method within my class. > > > > > > Am I missing something? > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Nate > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > http://blog.natebeck.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > Nate > ---------------------------------------- > http://blog.natebeck.net >
