Flex gets my vote. You'd want to give JavaFX more time to mature (read: "get the bugs out"). If you must go with Java, go with JSF and its variants.
- Alex --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Fotis Chatzinikos <fotis.chatzini...@...> wrote: > > Hi, > > I would go for flex... It is quite easy to start with but has a steep > learning curve for more advanced functionality but still... > > JavaFX is out for what.. a month? Not really tested anywhere yet... > > Flex renders / runs inside the flash pluggin which is far easier to find > installed than java... > > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 6:45 PM, TCash21 > <tanya_cashor...@...>wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I'm currently trying to push Adobe Flex at my company for complex > > network visualizations. The application will also need to run > > computationally intensive simulations (accessing backend java code) as > > well as some other distributed tasks. I know Java can store > > everything in memory and access it but is Flex just as able? Would it > > require Flex Data Services and what are the advantages? I'm easily > > sold on the UI-experience and aesthetic appeal of the front-end, I'm > > just unsure how it would handle massive computational efforts on the > > backend and display it all to the client quickly. > > > > We're trying to figure out the best way to go, will it be JavaFX? Flex > > Data Services? Flex and Java integrated? Elixir? > > > > Thank you all for any input, > > -Tanya > > > > > > > > > > -- > Fotis Chatzinikos, Ph.D. > Founder, > Phinnovation > fotis.chatzini...@..., >
