Hey guys, All we do mostly is develop in Flex with ColdFusion and using MYSQL, so I created a blog to pretty much connect those three
http://blog.tygate.com/ --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Brad Bueche" <b...@...> wrote: > > Tariq and Valdhor......I just NEED to say thanks AGAIN. > > Tariq you had an hello world article by the flex doc team on your site > for flex 2 that broke the ice for me and enabled me to understand the > directory layout that I needed. Valdhor, that flexcf.com site > absolutely rocks! I went from not knowing cold fusion at all this > afternoon to being able to pull a data set down from oracle into a grid > this evening. I'll tackle the advanced data grid tomorrow. > > HIGHLY recomended! > > brad > > -----Original Message----- > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On > Behalf Of Brad Bueche > Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 12:07 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Need a Flex 3, using local cfc server, > tutorial > > > > > > Thanks Tariq and Valdhor. > > Yes, actually if there was some detailed documentation on what the > wizard was doing that would be quite helpful I guess. And, I think I > spoke to rashly about the demos, they ARE impressive and the quick CRUD > stuff seemed to be very beneficial to the Ruby on Rails phenomenon. I > think if the documentation explained what the demo's were doing (in > detail) and explained how the resulting code could be changed, then > they'd be much more useful to people just starting out with remoting > (like me). > > I'll look at the simple demo/applications (and hope they have good > explanations!). Once I understand how to bring a few rows back and > format them, then I'll be good to go. > > brad > > -----Original Message----- > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On > Behalf Of Tariq Ahmed > Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:31 AM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Need a Flex 3, using local cfc server, > tutorial > > > > Hi Brad. > > You're probably better off just making things from scratch - or using > simple demos/sample applications like you mentioned. > > I've collected various CF+Flex articles here: > http://www.cflex. > <http://www.cflex.net/showfiledetails.cfm? ChannelID=1&Object=File&object > ID=618> net/showfiledetails.cfm?ChannelID=1&Object=File&objectID=618 > > And Dan Vegas recently posted an 11 part series on CF+Flex. > http://www.danvega. <http://www.danvega.org/blog/> org/blog/ > > > > > Brad Bueche wrote: > > > > > Ok, finally getting back into flex (TO STAY) after almost a year. I > even purchased Flex 3 professional with my own money! And I'm going to > make another attempt to get flex apps into my area of the company. > > I tried the wizard but wizards are a Catch-22: > > If you need the wizard to create your code, you'll get something that is > essentially nothing more than a demo and you wont understand how it did > what it did or where to go from there. If you understand what the > wizard does and it could actually use a wizard to speed things up, you > dont need it because you'd rather do it your own way. (They really seem > to only be useful for impressing people who dont actually code). > > The tutorials that I have found so far assume you are using a J2EE > implementation......or they are for Flex 2. So I need one for Flex 3 > that walks through using the local cf server. I have cf hooked up to > the db's (data sources work). And the wizard demo app works. However, > I dont need what the wizard does and I dont understand how its laying > out all the files. I need an explanation of that so that. If anybody > knows of some good walk throughs or tutorials on this pleas let me know. > > > > -- > > Tariq Ahmed :: tariq [(at)] cflex.net > Manager, Product Development > Amcom Technology :: www.amcomtech. <http://www.amcomtech.net> net > <http://www.adobe.com/communities/experts/members/tariq_ahmed.html> > Adobe Community Expert <http://www.cflex.net> Community Adobe Flex > <http://www.dopejam.com> Tariq's Home Page >
