If it was going *that* well you'd publish some stats. This is a REALLY IMPORTANT issue to many of us.
Please help us help you by finding a way of pushing the frameworks out so that we don't have to cop the blame from our employers, customers and users about why the binary is suddenly taking longer to download. The whole concept is great, but the support and follow-through from Adobe has been too slow. It's hard to understand why when you have an automatically updating plugin that could be preemptively loading this stuff for us. Guy Quoting Matt Chotin <mcho...@adobe.com>: > Hi, > > We are not publishing data on this right now, but in general > adoption of the cached framework appears to be going well. > > Matt > Flex team > > > On 5/14/09 5:10 PM, "Bjorn Schultheiss" <bjorn.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > good question. > I would also like to know > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , Nayan Savla <nayansa...@...> > wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I am just wondering if there is some data on the percentage of Flash >> players which would already have a the flex framework cache. Our >> application without the cache is 456Kb and when i use framework >> caching its 256Kb and the swz file is around 500kb. >> >> In this scenario if the user doesn't already have the framework >> cached, it won't make any sense to use framework caching. We don't >> have a high percentage of returning users yet. >> >> So if there is any data which gives an idea about the percentage of >> Flash players out there with the Flex framework cache, it will be >> really helpful. >> >> Thank you >> Nayan >> > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
