Tariq,
  Thanks for the long list of alternatives. Some of them actually look 
promising. Which one in
your view comes closest to the gizzmos provided by Flex?

  My point is, I didn't see this group talk about alternatives. One way to put 
pressure on MM is
to support an open source/3rd party version that is equivalent in 
functionality. I am not
necessarily looking for a branded product, I just want to get the job done.

Anupam.

 

--- Tariq Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Yo. Well as mentioned there was HUGE sticker shock when MM doubled the 
> price, and a lot of complaining. But MM is aiming at large Enterprises 
> that can afford it. Similarly you can complain to Ferrari to drop the 
> prices of their cars... but if you wanna role with the high end you 
> gotta shell out the dough.
> 
> There is a slew of alternatives out there too (Droplets, 
> Xamalon/XAML/Sparkle, Laszlo, JSF, XUI, XUL based stuff, SwixML, 
> Thinlets, XSWT,Luxor,Keystone,Jazilla,Vexi,Ajax,etc....). As a consumer 
> of course I want cheaper prices, and hopefully stiff competion will 
> pressure MM to drop the price of Flex. And hopefully with the next 
> version of Flex we'll see some FLEXible pricing options (eg serverless 
> solution via Zorn, etc...). <fingers crossed>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Anupam wrote:
> 
> >My issue is with the deployment cost. So the only alternative for small-time 
> >Web application
> >developers is to have their own servers for deployment. 
> >I am surprised that not many people are talking about it. It seems people 
> >are happy with the
> >status-quo, ie. paying huge amounts to MM.
> >I am also disappointed that there aren't many more 3rd party providers of 
> >Flex servers.
> >
> >Anupam.
> >
> >
> >--- Tracy Spratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>The issue of cost doesn't affect the developer since you can get the
> >>perpetual developer license for free.
> >>
> >>The cost is a major issue when you go to put a commercial application in
> >>production, and there is currently no alternative (if using Flex)
> >>
> >>You can apply for a non-commercial license if that is your situation.
> >>
> >>Tracy
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> >>Behalf Of Anupam
> >>Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 10:32 PM
> >>To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> >>Subject: [flexcoders] Flex Server Alternatives
> >>
> >>Hi all,
> >>  Is there any alternative to Flex server, except the (very expensive)
> >>one provided by MM?
> >>  Are there any other options? Have all the members of this group who
> >>are using Flex bought
> >>it/evaluating it? Or is there any other option like a compatible
> >>freeware? 
> >>
> >>  I know freeware versions of Flash Remoting do exist, is there anything
> >>for Flex?
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Anupam.
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> 
> 
> 
> 



        
                
______________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! for Good 
Donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. 
http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/ 



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/nhFolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to