Actually, we can create an mxml based TextInput, it works for me.

Post your ActionSscript code at http://github.com/ or http://pastebin.com/ and
we will work it out.

--
Best regards,
Andriy Panas



On 14 July 2010 18:34, bhaq1972 <mbha...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> Thanks Andriy
>
> I just got round to testing it as a ActionScript class and it worked.
>
> I'm very surprised it we cant create an mxml based TextInput component.
>
> but there you go.
>
> thanks
> bod
>
>
> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, Andriy
> Panas <a.pa...@...> wrote:
> >
> > I cannot reproduce your issue in a normal case.
> >
> > I can reproduce your issue only in extreme case, e.g.
> >
> > <local:MyTextInput text="textValue1">
> > <fx:String>textValue2</fx:String>
> > </local:MyTextInput>
> >
> >
> > BTW, why extend from TextInput class in MXML?
> >
> > If there are no visual subchildren in your custom component, it's better
> to
> > extend the class in solemn ActionScript.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andriy Panas
> >
> >
> >
> > On 14 July 2010 13:41, bhaq1972 <mbha...@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > I have created a very simple MyTextInput
> > >
> > > MyTextInput.mxml
> > > -----------------
> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
> > > <s:TextInput xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009";
> > > xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
> > > xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx">
> > > <fx:Declarations>
> > > !-- Place non-visual elements (e.g., services, value objects) here -->
> > > </fx:Declarations>
> > > </s:TextInput>
> > >
> > > When I try using it in a Application I am getting the compile error -
> > >
> > > Multiple initializer values for default property, 'text', of type
> 'String'
> > >
> > > What am I missing?
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > testApp
> > > -------
> > > <s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009";
> > > xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
> > > xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx"
> > > xmlns="*">
> > >
> > > <MyTextInput/>
> > > </s:Application>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>  
>

Reply via email to