You could write your set functions to be write-once.
On 7/23/10 11:35 AM, "Richard Rodseth" <rrods...@gmail.com> wrote: Getting a little off-topic, but in case anyone's interested: http://www.developer.com/lang/other/article.php/3874551/Clojure-Immutability-at-the-Language-Level.htm One Flex-specific wrinkle is that if you define a class with a >1 argument constructor and getters only, you can't instantiate it in MXML. And in AS3, you can't have mutliple constructors. I'm not sure, but I imagine some of the serialization libraries for JSON etc might have issues too if you don't have the zero-argument constructor. On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Richard Rodseth <rrods...@gmail.com> wrote: Yes, obviously. But not the same thing. If you write your VO’s to have only get functions, they are effectively immutable. On 7/23/10 8:56 AM, "Richard Rodseth" <rrods...@gmail.com <http://rrods...@gmail.com> > wrote: Interesting. I haven't used that one either. The docs emphasize the addEventListener capability, which I guess distinguishes this from plain old Object, which can also hold arbitrary properties. http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/langref/mx/utils/ObjectProxy.html As an aside, I would love to have language support for designating VOs as immutable. On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com <http://aha...@adobe.com> > wrote: ObjectProxy is a generic VO. It is dynamic and can hold any properties and values. And it is slow. Best to create custom Vos that are strongly typed. On 7/22/10 2:52 PM, "mark.embrey" <mark.c.emb...@gmail.com <http://mark.c.emb...@gmail.com> <http://mark.c.emb...@gmail.com> > wrote: I'm trying to wrap my feeble brain around these concepts. Are they the same? -similar? -completely different? Your feedback will be appreciated by this greenhorn. Mark -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe System, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui