Or.... maybe the person that wrote the Java Date class is from Venus and the person that wrote the Actionscript one just copied him. You might get quite some support on the Java assertion...
John 2012/1/13 Rick Winscot <rick.wins...@zyche.com> > ** > > > I'm suspicious… I think that the person that wrote the Date class is from > Venus. > > Cheers, > > Rick Winscot > > From: John Fletcher <fletch...@gmail.com> > Reply-To: "flexcoders@yahoogroups.com" <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:03:28 +0100 > To: "flexcoders@yahoogroups.com" <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: date problem? > > > > Months start at 0 and go up to 11. > > Don't ask me why. > > John > > 2012/1/12 luvfotography <ygro...@all-digital-links.com> > >> ** >> >> >> >> http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/Date.html#methodSummary >> >> says: >> >> If you pass two or more arguments, the Date object is assigned a time >> value based on the argument values passed, which represent the date's year, >> month, date, hour, minute, second, and milliseconds. >> >> >> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "luvfotography" <ygroups@...> wrote: >> > >> > Why does: >> > trace((new Date(2012,01,15)).toString()); >> > and >> > trace((new Date('2012','01','15')).toString()); >> > >> > return: >> > >> > Wed Feb 15 00:00:00 GMT-0800 2012 >> > >> > February?? >> > >> >> > > > -- > John > > *You're old enough to make your own decisions about the environment > without me telling you what you should and shouldn't print. But if you do > print, I hope this signature doesn't cause the message to go onto an > additional page. Because that would be kind of stupid, wouldn't it?* > > >
