On this note of starting project, I want to deploy a test project on Windows Server 2003; but all that is in the bin directory are .swf's -- is there an ISAPI DLL or CGI EXE (or .Net control) that can process Flex 2.0 projects?
I simply cannot afford 1.5 Enterprise Server and anyways, I'm more on the grounds of convincing 2 current clients to go with FLEX 2 for next spring sometime and I want to start showing them the advantages right now. One is a Very Popular eBay seller of poker accessories and collectibles from well known top players. -r --- Gordon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yup, I agree. > > - Gordon > > -----Original Message----- > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of JesterXL > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 1:56 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Start Project with > Flex 1.5 or Flex 2.0 > > To say it another way, utilizing AS3 without using > strict-datatyping > seems > like one is missing the point of using Flash Player > 8.5. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gordon Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 4:14 PM > Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Start Project with > Flex 1.5 or Flex 2.0 > > > Waddya mean by "not fly"? Leaving off type > annotations is legal AS3, but > it isn't recommended for serious apps. Without them > the compiler can't > help you find a lot of programming mistakes, and > your app will run > slower because all properties and methods have to be > looked up in hash > tables on dynamic Objects. > > - Gordon > > > -----Original Message----- > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of JesterXL > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 9:16 AM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Start Project with > Flex 1.5 or Flex 2.0 > > // this won't fly > var s = "some text"; > > // this is good! > var s:String = "some text"; > > You do the below for all variables that can be > typecast/datatyped, > you'll > save a LOT of time. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "jwc_wensan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 12:06 PM > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Start Project with Flex > 1.5 or Flex 2.0 > > > Jester: > > Well, there is a deadline, but we do have SOME, not > much, "wiggle > room". > > It was our initial opinion to proceed with Flex 1.5, > but I wanted to > get other thoughts on the matter. > > I am not exactly sure what you mean when you say > "type cast". Can > you elaborate? > > Thanks, > > Jack > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "JesterXL" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > No deadline? PIMP! > > > > I'd use Flex 1.5, and convert to 2.0 when she's > solid. > > > > I was originally under the impression that porting > an app required > an > > inordinate amount of time, but was correct > yesterday. > ActionScript only > > projects, a.k.a. Flash, take longer because they > are heavy in > ActionScript. > > However, since MXML hasn't changed much in Flex 2, > there is very > little you > > have to do. Additionally, since the components > underneath > abstract it, much > > of it still works as intended. > > > > As far as ActionScript, as long as you type cast > correctly, the > only thing > > you have to do in 2 is declare your bindings > explicitly by adding > some > > additional, small code. > > > > One of these dudes on here, whoever did the Flex > Store app, did a > preso on > > this at MAX, although, I wasn't there so didn't > see it. His preso > might be > > online somewhere. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "jwc_wensan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 11:30 AM > > Subject: [flexcoders] Start Project with Flex 1.5 > or Flex 2.0 > > > > > > To All: > > > > We are beginning a large project that we project > will take 3-4 > > months to complete. We are not tied to a > deadline, but would like > > to have up and running by March 1, 2006. We do > have some "wiggle" > > room. > > > > My question(s) to the experts . . . . > > > > Would you develop with Flex 1.5 and then convert > to Flex 2.0 when > it > > is released or start with Flex 2.0? I realize "it > depends on the > > app", but anyone have info own time required to > convert 1.5 app to > a > > 2.0 app? 10% of original development? 20%? > > > > Best guess? > > > > There are some features in Flex 2.0 we need, but > they do not have > to > > be there in our first release. > > > > If it is the concensus of this group that Flex 2.0 > would be > released > > by April/May then we might decide to go straight > to Flex 2.0 > > > > If as with most software releases, probably more > later than sooner, > > more like May/June then that puts us back in Flex > 1.5. > > > > All opinions and insight will be welcomed. > > > > Thanking You In Advance, > > > > Jack > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Flexcoders Mailing List > > FAQ: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > > Search Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders% > 40yahoogroups.com > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > === message truncated === __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/cd_AJB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/nhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
