Hi Leon, This mxmlc option will enable setting the amfgateway url @ runtime: -remoteallowurloverride It will allow you to externally control the amfgateway via the html wrapper via either of the following usages: <param name='flashVars' value='gatewayUrl=http://myMachine:8700/samples/amfgateway'> Or <param name='src' value='roTest.swf?gatewayUrl=http://myMachine:8700/samples/amfgateway'> regards, peter
-----Original Message----- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leon Tanner Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 4:46 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question Ok, we've gone down the route of using mxmlc.jar for precompilation. The reason is purely to include data within the SWF to save a return trip to the server - and also to reduce the load on the server at initial request time. Our process is essentially running a series of Ant tasks that firstly compile all our Java classes, secondly precompile our MXML and lastly create a WAR ready for deployment. Since the MXML is precompiled without using the Flex server whatsoever, we need to specify the gateway to the compiler - this is currently done in flex-config.xml. At present we can't find a way to make this relative - i.e. not to include the name of the root directory. For example: <amf-gateway>/myFlexApp/amfgateway</amf-gateway> Ideally what we'd like is: <amf-gateway>./amfgateway</amf-gateway> The reason why we'd like this is - when we create a WAR and deploy to our customers, we don't have control over what they choose to name the WAR file. Since the name of the WAR file relates to the root directory name and we can't find a way to make that value relative, we have a hugs issue here! Has anyone come across this or have any ideas we could try to get around it? Thanks L -----Original Message----- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darron J. Schall Sent: 24 January 2006 00:45 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question Dave Wolf wrote: > I was just shown your weblog today about this and they are awesome. > The crazy part is they look a ton like ours. Guess you have a couple > of smart people and they reach the same conclusions! Really great > posting Darron. We have tons of macros for everything from compiling > the swf, the rsl's, java jars, deploying web services etc. > > Not so crazy - I was talking with Ted on IM when he was working on them for you. ;-) Either way, Flex + ANT is a good combination. Sure, there's a learning curve.. but it's a powerful technology and one worth learning, in my opinion. -d -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
