The reason it still takes more time than in the IDE is that mxmlc has to be loaded and initialized every time you start it from the commandline whereas in Eclipse, the compiler is loaded only once and stays in the Java VM.
Setting incremental=true on mxmlc should still be faster than without but it is a lot slower than compiling from Eclipse (not a Mac issue, the same is true for PC) Dirk. > -----Original Message----- > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alisdair Mills > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 7:39 AM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Mac Flex developing > > yeah... i add incremental but for some reason it still takes between > 8 and 20 seconds. the output from mxmlc is as follows.... > > Files: 546 Time: 8458ms > Linking... 100ms > Optimizing... 901ms > SWF Encoding... 180ms > Persisting 114 compilation units... 160ms Total time: 12607ms > > am i doing something wrong? my syntax is as follows... mxmlc > -- incremental=true -output=deploy/FeverPitch.swf src/FeverPitch.mxml. > > cheers, Al > -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
