Yes, that was the workaround. Is there look into changing the behavior
of NetConnection in the player before Flex is released for production?
By the way, thanks for the code tip.
- Sof
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Farland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Was that the workaround that involved using a unique endpoint URL to
> avoid connection sharing?
>
> If so, in FDS 2 you could create a new AMFChannel and assign it as part
> of a service's channelSet:ChannelSet property.
>
> import mx.messaging.ChannelSet;
> import mx.messaging.Channel;
> import mx.messaging.channels.AMFChannel;
>
> ...
>
> var channelSet:ChannelSet = new ChannelSet();
> var channel:Channel = new AMFChannel("my-amf",
> "http://localhost:8700/cfusion/messagebroker/amf";);
> channelSet.addChannel(channel);
> remoteObject.channelSet = channelSet;
>
> ...
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of sof4real03
> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:26 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in
> parallel?
>
> If RemoteObjects results do not come back in parallel then how would one
> implement the workaround Peter Ent posted since the "endpoint"
> attribute is no longer supported in Flex 2.
>
> Thanks,
> Sof
>
> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Farland" <pfarland@> wrote:
> >
> > It isn't up to the Flex RemoteObject feature... it's how the flash
> > player NetConnection works with AMF requests (and continues to work in
>
> > FP 8.5).
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of sof4real03
> > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 3:15 PM
> > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Do RemoteObject results still not operate in
>
> > parallel?
> >
> > Does anyone know if this is a still an outstanding design of
> > RemoteObjects and AMF?
> >
> > Much thanks,
> > Sof
> >
> > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "sof4real03" <soubraham2@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've come across an article by Peter Ent regarding how AMF results
> > > using RemoteObjects do not return in parallel, but wait until all
> > > requests are completed. He also posted a workaround. I was just
> > > wondering if this is still a valid workaround or has the design been
>
> > > revamped with the Data Services?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sof
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Flexcoders Mailing List
> > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> > Search Archives:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Flexcoders Mailing List
> FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> Search Archives:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
