and standalone Tomcat. Haven't tried insecure over IIS->JRun, but
I'll test it out sometime today. It's just when I'm trying to run in
a secure mode over anything but standalone JRun.
Thanks.
-Steven
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Matt Chotin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure either since I don't have Apache set up for
debugging. We
> really don't think there should be a difference between JRun
standalone
> and JRun with a connector, but clearly something is getting messed
up.
> Does insecure work with the connector?
>
> Matt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Steven Toth
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 7:53 AM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex 2.0 Remote Objects over
SecureAMFChannel
> (HTTPS) in Apache or IIS
>
> No, nothing really changed in the flex config. files other than the
> port when I was going directly through Tomcat and JRun. When going
> through Apache and IIS they stayed the same .
>
> I'd say with near certainty the port is configured correctly since
> I'm seeing the Command and Acknowledge messages in the console and
> the log. Also when going through Apache and IIS I see in the web
> server log that it is calling the messagebroker/amfsecure servlet
and
> getting a 200 back.
>
> For some reason, I can't tell why since there's no source code and
> very little information available in the log other than the
messages,
> it does not get (or process) the Remoting messages. That's why I
> feel like something else may need to be configured. However, the
> same configuration works when running directly through JRun over
> SecureAMF (HTTPS). Of course, that's the only time it works.
>
> I appreciate all the help, but I'm not sure where to go from here.
> It doesn't seem like anyone else has tried to get Flex 2 working in
a
> secure environment (other than JRun). Like I said, I'd be elated
if
> I was doing something wrong that was easily corrected as opposed to
> waiting for a new release. However, I've gone over this more times
> than I'd like to count and I cannot see anything wrong and other
(non-
> Flex) J2EE applications are running correctly over HTTPS.
>
>
> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Matt Chotin" <mchotin@> wrote:
> >
> > I've forwarded on to QA to see if we know of any issues. Did
> anything
> > change between configurations when you use the connector like what
> > server name you use? Is the port configured right?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Steven Toth
> > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 11:01 AM
> > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex 2.0 Remote Objects over
> SecureAMFChannel
> > (HTTPS) in Apache or IIS
> >
> > I've also setup the flex application to run on Tomcat. Again, it
> works
> > fine over an AMFChannel (HTTP), but not over a SecureAMF channel
> > (HTTPS). It seems that there's a bug here. The only platform I
> could
> > get it to work strictly over the SecureAMFChannel is standalone
> JRun.
> > I was not able to get it to work strictly over HTTPS on
standalone
> > Tomcat, Apache->Tomcat, Apache->JRun, or IIS-JRun. All of these
> > configurations support working applications that are executing
> strictly
> > over HTTPS.
> >
> > Has anyone had other results? Can anyone at Macromedia/Adobe
> comment?
> > Flex 2.0 is a great technology, but it's not going to penetrate
the
> > mainstream if it won't run on the lion's share of web
> environments.
> > We've made a concerted effort to use Flex 2.0 and it would be
> counter
> > productive to move back to the Flex 1.5 platform. Strictly using
> JRun
> > is not an option where existing environments are already
situated.
> >
> > I would be elated if I were simply missing something or
configured
> > something incorrectly, but other applications are working fine on
> these
> > configurations. Also, as I mentioned previously, I see some of
the
> > flex messages in the log. Are there additional settings to run
> over
> > SecureAMF?
> >
> > I'm truly at an impass. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
> >
> > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Steven Toth" <steventoth@>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Has anyone been able to get Flex 2.0 remote objects to work
over
> a
> > > SecureAMFChannel (HTTPS) in Apache or IIS via the JRUN
> connectors? I
> > > have had success over a AMFChannel (HTTP) in Apache and IIS,
but
> have
> > > only been able to get it to work over a SecureAMFChannel
(HTTPS)
> when
> > > using JRun by itself.
> > >
> > > When executing over a AMFChannel (HTTP) in Apache and IIS, or
> over a
> > > SecureAMFChannel (HTTPS) in standalone JRun I see traces for
> > > CommandMessage, AcknowledgeMessage, and RemotingMessage.
> However,
> > > when running over a SecureAMFChannel (HTTPS) in Apache or IIS I
> only
> > > see the CommandMessage and AcknowledgeMessage.
> > >
> > > Any help would be greatly appreciated, I've put a lot of effort
> into
> > > getting this to work and I'm at a loss. Thanks.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Flexcoders Mailing List
> > FAQ:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> > Search Archives:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Flexcoders Mailing List
> FAQ:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> Search Archives:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
